...synonimous ; a new term was not introduced, but because the former was thought inadequate : n/imes, therefore, have often many ideas, but few ideas Have many names. It was then necessary to use the proximate word, for the deficiency of single terms can very seldom be supplied...

...exactly synonymous ; a new term was not introduced, but because the former was thought inadequate : names, therefore, have often many ideas, but few ideas have many names. It was then necessary to use the proximate word, for the deficiency of single terms can very seldom be supplied...

...exactly synonimous ; a new term was not introduced, but because the former was thought inade-. quate : names, therefore, have often many ideas, but few ideas have many names. It was then necessary to use the proximate word, for the deficiency of single terms can very seldom be supplied...

...exactly synonymous ; a new term was not introduced, but because the former was thought inadequate : names, therefore, have often many ideas, but few ideas have many names. It was then necessary to use the proximate word, for the deficiency of single terms can very seldom be supplied...

...exactly ^--'Synonymous; a new term was not introduced, but because the former was thought inadequate: names, therefore, have often many ideas, but few ideas have many names. It was then necessary to use the proxi- 15 mate word, for the deficiency of single terms can very seldom be supplied...

...introduced, sometimes such as no other form of ex- but because the former was thought inpression can convey. e blood; To him the wit of Greece and Rome was known, And every author's merit but The original sense of words is often It was then necessary to use the proximate driven out of use by...

...exactly synonymous ; a new term was not introduced, but because the former was thought inadequate: names, therefore, have often many ideas, but few ideas have many names. It was then necessary to use the proximate word, for the deficiency of single terms can very seldom be supplied...

...seldom exactly synonimous; a new term was not introduced, but because the former was thought inadequate: names, therefore, have often many ideas, but few ideas have many names. It was then necessary to use the proximate word, for the deficiency of single terms can very seldom be supplied...

...problem of defining simple words - "the idea signified by them has not more than one appellation . . . names, therefore, have often many ideas, but few ideas have many names" and this, in turn, suggested to him the inescapably diachronic, and metaphoric, nature of language:...