« AnteriorContinuar »
which the incomprehensible whole is governed. To we want to contemplate his muniticence? We see it in the abundance with which he fills the earth. Do we want to contemplate his mercy? We see it in iis not withholding that abundance, even from the unthankful. In fine, do we want to know what God is? Search not the book called the Scripture, which any hunan hand might make, but the Scripture called the Creation.
The only idea man can atiix to the name of God, is that of a first cause, the cause of all things. And incomprehensible and difficult as it is for a man to conceive what a first cause is, be arrives at the belief of it, from the tenfold greater difficulty of dishelieving it.
It is difficult beyond description to conceive that space can have no end; but it is more difficult to conceive an end. It is dittcult beyond the power of man to conceive an ete nal duration of what we cail time; but it is more impossible to conceive a time when there shall be no time. In like manner of reasoning, every thing we behold carries in it. self the internal evidence that it did not make itselr. Ivery man is an evidence to himself, that he did not make himself; neither could his father inake himself, nor his grandfather, nor any of his race; neither could any tree, plant, or animal make itself; and it is the conviction arising from this evidence, that carries us on, as it were, by necessity, to the belief of a first cause eternally existing, of a nature totally different to any material existence we know of, and by the power of which all things exist; and this first cause man calls God.
It is only by the exercise of reason, that man can discover God. Take away that reason, and he would be incapable of understanding any thing; and, in this case, it would be just as consistent to read even the book called the Bible to a horse as to a man.
llow then is it that those people pretend to reject reason?
Almost the only parts in the book called the Bible, that convey to us any idea of God, are some chapters in Job, and the 10th Psalm; I recollect no other. are trne d: istical compositions; for they treat of the Deity through his works. They take the book of Creation as the word of God, they refer to no other book, and all the inferences they make are drawn from that volume.
I insert, in this place, the 19th Psalm, as paraphrased into English verse by Addison. I recollect not the prose, and where I write this I have not the opportunity of see. ing it.
The spacious firmament on high,
The unwearied sun, from day to day,
What more does man want to know than that the hand, or power, that made these things is divine, is omnipotent? Let him believe this with the force it is impossible to repel, if he permits his reason to act, and his rule of moral lite will follow of course.
The allusions in Job have all of them the same tendency with this Psalm: that of deducing or proving a truth, that would be otherwise unknown, from truths already known.
I recollect not enough of the passages in Job, to insert them correctly: but there is one occurs to me that is applicable to the subject I am speaking upon.
“Canst thou by searching find out God? Canst thou find out the Almighty to perfection?"
I know not how the printers have pointed this passage, for I keep no Bible; but it contains two distinct questions, that admit of distinct answers.
First,-Canst thou by searching find out God? Yes; because in the first place, I know I did not make myself, and yet I have existence; and by searching into the nature of other things, I find that no other thing could make itself; and yet millions of other things exist; therefore it is, that I know, by positive conclusion resulting from this search, that there is a power superior to all those things, and that power is God.
Secondly, -Canst thou find out the Almighty to perfection? No; not only because the power and wisdom He has manifested in the structure of the Creation that I be. hold, is to me incompreheusible, but because even this manifestation, great as it is, is probably but a small display of that immensity of power and wisdom, by which inillions of other worlds, to me invisible by their distance, were created and continue to exist.
It is evident, that both these questions were put to the reason of the person to whom they are supposed to have been addresseil; and it is only by admitting the first question to be answered affirmatively, that the second could follow. It would have been unnecessary, and even absurd, to have put a second question more difficult than the first, if the first question had been answered negative. ly. The two questions have different objects; the first refers to the existence of God, the second to his attributes; reason can discover the one, but it falls infinitely short in discovering the whole of the other.
I recollect not a single passage in all the writings ascribed to the men called apostles, that convey any idea of what God is. Those writings are chiefly controversial; and the subject they dwell upon, that of a man dying in igony on a cross, is better suited to the glooiny genius of a monk in a cell, by whom it is not impossible they were written, than to a rý man breathing the open air of the Creation. The only passage that occurs to me, that has any reference to the works of God, by which only his power and wisdom can be known, is related to have been spoken by Jesus Christ, as a remedy against distrustful
Behold the lilies of the field, they toil not, nei. ther do they spin." This, however, is far inferior to the allusions in Job, and in the 19th Psalm; but it is similar in idea, and the modesty of the imagery is correspondent to the modesty of the man.
As to the Christian system of faith, it appears to me as a species of atheism-ä sort of religious denial of God. It proiesses to believe in a man rather than in God. It is a compound made up chiefly of Manism with but little Deism, and is as near to Atheism as twilight is to darkness. It introduces between man and his Maker an opaque body, which it calls a Redeemer, as the moon introduces her opaque self between the earth and the sun, and it produces by this means a religious or an irreligious eclipse of light. It has put the whole orbit of reason into shade.
The effect of this obscurity has been that of turning every thing upside down, and representing it in reverse; and among the revolutions it has thus magically produced, it has made a revolution in Theology.
That which is now called natural philosophy, embracing the whole circle of science, of which Astronomy occupies the chief place, is the study of the works of God, and of the power and wisdom of God in his works, and is the true theology.
AGE OF REASON.
25 As to the theology that is now studied in its place, it is the study of human opinions, and of human fancies concerning God. It is not the study of God himself in the works that he has made, but in the works or writings that man has made; and it is not among the least of the mischiefs that the Christian system has done to the world, that it has abandoned the original and beautiful system of theology, like a beautiful innocent to distress and reproach, to make room for the bag of superstition.
The book of Job, and the 19th Psalm, which even the church admits to be more ancient than the chronological order in which they stand in the book called the Bible, are theological orations conforınable to the original system of theology. The internal evidence of those orations proves to a demonstration that the study and contemplation of the works of Creation, and of the power and wisdoin of God, revealed and manifested in those works, made a great part of the religious devotion of the times in which they were written; and it was this devotional study and contemplation that led to the discovery of the principles upon which, what are now called Sciences, are established; and it is to the discovery of these principles that almost all the Arts that contribute to the convenience of human life, owe their existence. Every principal art has some science for its parent, though the person who mechanically performs the work does not always, and but very seldom, perceive the connexion.
It is a fraud of the Christian systein to call the sciences haman invention; it is only the application of them that is human. Every science has for its basis a system of principles as fixed and unalterable as those by which the universe is regulated and governed. Man cannot enake principles; he can only discover thein:
For example, Every person who looks at an Almanack sees an account when an eclipse will take place, and he sees also that it never fails to take place according to the account there given. This shews that man is acquainted with the laws by which the heavenly bodies move. But it would be something worse than ignorance, were any church on earth to say, that those laws are an human invention. It would also be ignorance, or something worse, to say that the scientific principles, by the aid of which man is enabled to calculate and foreknow when an eclipse will take place, are an human invention. Man cannot invent any thing that is eternal and immutable ; and the scientific principles he employs for this purpose must, and are, of necessity, as eternal and immutable as the laws by which the heavenly bodies move, or they could not be used as they are to ascertain the time when, and the manner how, an eclipse will take place.
The scientific principles that man employs to obtain the fore-knowledge of an eclipse, or of any thing else, relating to the motion of the heaveily bodies, are contained chiefly in that part of science which is called Trigonometry, or the properties of a triangle, which when applied to the study of the heavenly bodies, is called Astronomy; when applied to direct the course of a ship on the ocean, it is called Navigation; when applied to the construction of tigures drawn by rule and compass, it is called Geoinetry; when applied to the construction of plans of edi. fices, it is called Architecture; when applied to the measurement of any portion of the surface of the earth, it is called Land-surveying. In tine, it is the soul of science; it is an eternal truth; it contains the mathematical demon. stration of which man speaks, and the extent of its uses is unknown.
It may be said, that man can make or draw a triangle, and therefore a triangle is a human invention,
But the triangle, when drawn is no other than the image of the principle; it is a delineation to the eye, and from thence to the inind, ot' a principle that would otherwise be imperceptible. The triangle does not make the principle, any more than a candle taken into a room that was dark, makes the chairs and tables that before were invisible. All the properties of a triangle exist indepen. dently of the figure, and existed before any triangle was drawn or thought of by man. Van had no more to do in the formation of those properties or principles, than be had to do in making the laws by which the heavenly bodies move; and therefore the one inust have the sare divine origin as the other.
In the same manner as it may be said, that man can make a triangle, so also may it he said, he can make the suechanical instrument called a lever; but the principle, by which the lever acts, is a thing distinct from the instrument, and would exist if the instrument did not : it attaches itself to the instrument after it is inade; the instrument, therefore, can act no otherwise than it does act;
either can all the efforts of human invention make it act otherwise. That which, in all such cases, man calls the Cliect, is no other than the principle itself rendered perceptible to the senses.
Since then man cannot make principles, from whence did he gain a knowledge of them, so as to be able to apply them, not only to things on earth, but to ascertain the Laction of bodies so immensely distant froin him as all the heaven!v bodies are: From whence, I ask, could be gain that knowledge, but from the study of the true teology?
It is the structure of the universe that has taught this