Next day did many widdowes come, Their husbands to bewayle; They washt their wounds in brinish teares, 230 Theyr bodyes bathed in purple gore, They kist them dead a thousand times, 235 The newes was brought to Eddenborrow, "O, heavy newes," King James did say, I have not any captaine more Like tydings to King Henry came, That Percy of Northumberland "Now, God be with him," said our king, I trust I have, within my realme, Yett shall not Scotts, nor Scotland say, But I will vengeance take: I'll be revenged on them all, For brave Erle Percyes sake." This vow full well the king perform'd In one day, fifty knights were slayne, And of the rest, of small account, Thus endeth the hunting of Chevy-Chase, 240 245 250 255 260 God save our king, and bless this land 265 *** Since the former impression of these volumes hath been published, a new edition of "Collins's Peerage," 1779, &c. ix. Vols. 8vo. which contains, in Volume ii. p. 334, an historical passage, which may be thought to throw considerable light on the subject of the preceding ballad: viz. "In this year, 1436, according to Hector Boethius, was fought the Battle of Pepperden, not far from the Cheviot Hills, between the Earl of Northumberland [iid Earl, son of Hotspur,] and Earl William Douglas, of Angus, with a small army of about four thousand men each, in which the latter had the advantage. As this seems to have been a private conflict between these two great Chieftains of the borders, rather than a national war, it has been thought to have given rise to the celebrated old ballad of "Chevy Chace; which, to render it more pathetic and interesting, has been heightened with tragical incidents wholly fictitious." [See Ridpath's Border Hist. 4to. p. 401.] The surnames in the foregoing ballad are altered, either by accident or design, from the old original copy, and in common editions extremely corrupted. They are here rectified as much as they could be. Thus, Pag. 207. Ver. 202. Egerton.] This name is restored (instead of Ogerton, com. Ed.) from the editor's folio MS. The pieces in that MS. appear to have been collected, and many of them composed (among which might be this ballad) by an inhabitant of Cheshire; who was willing to pay a compliment here to one of his countrymen, of the eminent family De or Of Egerton (so the name was first written) ancestors of the present Duke of Bridgwater and this he could do with the more propriety, as the Percies had formerly great interest in that county: at the fatal battle of Shrewsbury all the flower of the Cheshire gentlemen lost their lives fighting in the cause of Hotspur. Ver. 203. Ratcliff.] This was a family much distinguished in Northumberland. Edw. Radcliffe, mil. was sheriff of that county in 17 of Ilen. VII. and others of the same surname afterwards. (See Fuller, p. 313.) Sir George Ratcliff, Knt. was one of the commissioners of inclosure in 1552. (See Nicholson, p. 330.) Of this family was the late Earl of Derwentwater, who was beheaded in 1715. The editor's folio MS. however, reads here, "Sir Robert Harcliffe and Sir William." The Harcleys were an eminent family in Cumberland. See Fuller, p. 224. Whether this may be thought to be the same name, I do not determine. Ver. 204. Barron.] This is apparently altered, (not to say corrupted) from Hearone, in p. 11, ver. 114. Ver. 207. Raby.] This might be intended to celebrate one of the ancient possessors of Raby Castle, in the county of Durham. Yet it is written "Rebbye," in the fol. MS. and looks like a corruption of Rugby or Rokeby, an eminent family in Yorkshire, see p. 11, p. 27. It will not be wondered that the Percies should be thought to bring followers out of that county, where they themselves were originally seated, and had always such extensive property and infiuence. Ver. 215. Murray.] So the Scottish copy. In the com. edit. it is "Carrel" or "Currel; " and "Morrell" in the fol. MS. Ver. 217. Murray.] So the Scot. edit.-The common copies read "Murrel." The fol. MS. gives the line in the following peculiar manner, "Sir Roger Heuer of Harcliffe too." Ver. 219. Lamb.] The folio MS. has "Sir David Lambwell, well esteemed." This seems evidently corrupted from "Lwdale" or "Liddell " in the old copy, see pages 11, 27. II. DEATH'S FINAL CONQUEST. THESE fine moral stanzas were originally intended for a solemn funeral song, in a play of James Shirley's, intitled "The Contention of Ajax and Ulysses: " no date, 8vo.-Shirley flourished as a dramatic writer early in the reign of Charles I.: but he outlived the Restoration. His death happened October 29, 1666. El. 72. This little poem was written long after many of these that follow, but is inserted here as a kind of Dirge to the foregoing piece. It is said to have been a favourite song with K. Charles II. THE glories of our birth and state Are shadows, not substantial things; 5 And in the dust be equal made With the poor crooked scythe and spade. Some men with swords may reap the field, They stoop to fate, And must give up their murmuring breath, The garlands wither on your brow, Then boast no more your mighty deeds; See where the victor victim bleeds: To the cold tomb, Only the actions of the just Smell sweet, and blossom in the dust. 10 15 20 III. THE RISING IN THE NORTH. THE subject of this ballad is the great Northern Insurrection in the 12th year of Elizabeth, 1569; which proved so fatal to Thomas Percy, the seventh Earl of Northumberland. There had not long before been a secret negotiation entered into between some of the Scottish and English nobility, to bring about a marriage between Mary Q. of Scots, at that time a prisoner in England, and the Duke of Norfolk, a nobleman of excellent character, and firmly attached to the Protestant religion. This match was proposed to all the most considerable of the English nobility, and among the rest to the Earls of Northumberland and Westmoreland, two noblemen very powerful in the North. As it seemed to promise a speedy and safe conclusion of the troubles in Scotland, with many advantages to the crown of England, they all consented to it, provided it should prove agreeable to Q. Elizabeth. The Earl of Leicester (Elizabeth's favourite) undertook to break the matter to her, but before he could find an opportunity, the affair had come to her ears by other hands, and she was thrown into a violent flame. The Duke of Norfolk, with several of his friends, was committed to the tower, and summons were sent to the Northern Earls instantly to make their appearance at court. It is said that the Earl of Northumberland, who was a man of a mild and gentle nature, was deliberating with himself whether he should not obey the message, and rely upon the queen's candour and clemency, when he was forced into desperate measures by a sudden report at midnight, Nov. 14, that a party of his enemies were come to seize on his person.* The Earl was then at his house at Topcliffe in Yorkshire. When rising hastily out of bed, he withdrew to the Earl of Westmoreland, at Brancepeth, where the country came in to them, and pressed them to take arms in their own defence. They accordingly set up their standards, declaring their intent was to restore the ancient religion, to get the succession of the crown firmly settled, and to prevent the destruction of the ancient nobility, &c. Their common bannert (on which was displayed the cross, together with the five wounds of Christ) was borne by an ancient gentleman, Richard Norton, Esq., of Norton-conyers: who, with his sons (among whom, Christopher, Marmaduke, and Thomas, are expressly named by Camden), distinguished himself on this occasion. Having entered Durham, they tore the Bible, &c., and caused mass to be said there: they then marched on to Clifford-moor near Wetherbye, where they mustered their men. Their intention was to have proceeded on to York, but, altering their minds, they fell upon Barnard's castle, which Sir George Bowes held out against them for eleven days. The two earls, who spent their large estates in hospitality, and were extremely beloved on that account, were masters of little ready money; the E. of Northumberland bringing with him only 8000 crowns, and the E. of Westmoreland nothing at all for the subsistence of their forces, they were not able to march to London, as they had at first intended. In these circumstances, Westmoreland began so visibly to despond, that many of his men slunk away, tho' Northumberland still kept up his resolution, and was master of the field till December 13, when the Earl of Sussex, accompanied with Lord Hunsden and others, having marched *This circumstance is overlooked in the ballad. Besides this, the ballad mentions the separate banners of the two Noblemen. |