Obedience to Authority: An Experimental ViewHarper Collins, 30 jun 2009 - 256 páginas In the 1960s Stanley Milgram carried out a series of experiments in which human subjects were given progressively more painful electro-shocks in a careful calibrated series to determine to what extent people will obey orders even when they knew them to be painful and immoral-to determine how people will obey authority regardless of consequences. These experiments came under heavy criticism at the time but have ultimately been vindicated by the scientific community. This book is Milgram′s vivid and persuasive explanation of his methods. |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 5
Página 9
... allow- ing an act to be dominated by its context, while neglecting its human consequences, can be dangerous in the extreme. At least one essential feature of the situation in Germany was not studied here—namely, the intense devaluation ...
... allow- ing an act to be dominated by its context, while neglecting its human consequences, can be dangerous in the extreme. At least one essential feature of the situation in Germany was not studied here—namely, the intense devaluation ...
Página 10
... allowing the slaughter of innocent men to take place before them. Similarly, so-called "intellectual resistance" in occupied Europe— in which persons by a twist of thought felt that they had defied the invader—was merely indulgence in a ...
... allowing the slaughter of innocent men to take place before them. Similarly, so-called "intellectual resistance" in occupied Europe— in which persons by a twist of thought felt that they had defied the invader—was merely indulgence in a ...
Página 18
... allowed to express preference.] Well, I guess the fairest way of doing this is for me to write the word Teacher on one slip of paper and Learner on the other and let you both draw. [The subject draws first, then the accomplice.] Well ...
... allowed to express preference.] Well, I guess the fairest way of doing this is for me to write the word Teacher on one slip of paper and Learner on the other and let you both draw. [The subject draws first, then the accomplice.] Well ...
Página 23
... allow 5 to 10 seconds before considering no response as a wrong answer, and to increase the shock level one step each time the learner failed to respond correctly. At 315 volts, after a violent scream, the victim reaffirmed vehemently ...
... allow 5 to 10 seconds before considering no response as a wrong answer, and to increase the shock level one step each time the learner failed to respond correctly. At 315 volts, after a violent scream, the victim reaffirmed vehemently ...
Página 24
... allowed expression of thoughts and feelings about their behavior. Recapitulation In this situation die subject must resolve a conflict between two mutually incompatible demands from the social field. He may continue to follow the orders ...
... allowed expression of thoughts and feelings about their behavior. Recapitulation In this situation die subject must resolve a conflict between two mutually incompatible demands from the social field. He may continue to follow the orders ...
Índice
1 | |
13 | |
Expected Behavior | 27 |
Closeness of the Victim | 32 |
Individuals Confront Authority | 44 |
Further Variations and Controls | 55 |
Individuals Confront Authority II | 73 |
Role Permutations | 89 |
Group Effects | 113 |
Why Obedience?An Analysis | 123 |
Applying the Analysis to | 135 |
Strain and Disobedience | 153 |
Is Aggression the Key? | 165 |
Epilogue | 179 |
Otras ediciones - Ver todo
Obedience to Authority: The Experiment That Challenged Human Nature Stanley Milgram Vista previa restringida - 2017 |
Términos y frases comunes
accept action administering shocks agentic aggressive answer Antecedent Conditions asked authority system automata behavior Bridgeport C. P. Snow carried command compliance confederates conflict continue critical David Rosenhan defiant subjects defied the experimenter demands destructive disobedience Dontz effect electric chair electric shock ence experimenter's factors Agentic feel forces function Henry Wirz hierarchy human hurt indicated individual instructions interview jects laboratory learning Mean maximum shock mechanisms ment menter Milgram moral naive subject Nazi Germany nervous obedience experiment obedient subjects obey the experimenter observed occur orders ordinary organization painful participants performance person procedure protests Proximity psychological punishment question refuse relationship responsibility role ROSENBLUM shock level shocking the victim situation Social Psychology Stanford Prison Experi Stanley Milgram status strain Strong Shock structure superego switch teacher tension tion told voltage volts Ugh women word pairs Yale Yale University