Imágenes de página
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

fitted out in London as a privateer..

her career

what was done at Halifax as to

reasons why Great Britain liable for acts of..
TENTERDEN, LORD:

memorandum on neutrality laws

says privateering was suppressed by reason of the course
adopted by Washington...

TERCEIRA, (see Saldanha's expedition :)

Alabama arrives there.....

TRANSSHIPMENT OF CONTRABAND OF WAR:

the permission in colonial ports a failure to perform the
duties of a nentral.......
injurious to the United States..

TREATY OF WASHINGTON:

expresses regret at escape of the cruisers

terms of submission of claims of the United States
meeting of the arbitrators, provisions for.
time for delivery of cases and evidence.

time for delivery of counter cases and evidence

when originals must be produced....

duties of agents of each government.

counsel may be heard..

rules applicable to the case, (see Neutrals).

award, when and how made..

board of assessors, how constituted and duties of..
the first clause in the first rule to be found in United States

neutrality law of 1794


what is due diligence..
fitting out, arming, or equipping, each an offense.
reasons for words "specially adapted," &c...
continuing force of second clause of first rule.
limitation and explanation of second rule..

recognizes obligation to make compensation for injuries....
TREATY OF 1794. (See United States.)
TRENHOLM, GEORGE A.:

principal member of firm of Fraser, Trenholm & Co., and
secretary of insurgent treasury....

TRENT. (See Great Britain.)

TRINIDAD:

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][subsumed][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

270

270

272

272

273

274

100

101

129

129

129

130

130

132

24

78

145

163

163

163

164

47

57

151

93

93

[ocr errors]

12

13

13

14

14, 63

14

64-67

71
71

91

247, 320 101, 129

110

110

110

111

111

111

TWENTY-FOUR HOURS' RULE:

contained in admiralty and colonial instructions...
UNITED STATES, (see Great Britain; Washington :)

relations with Great Britain before 1860 friendly.
various treaties with Great Britain...

number of States and Territories in 1860.
election of Mr. Lincoln as President.

secession of South Carolina and other States.
cause of secession

neutrality law of 1818

note.

had no municipal law in 1793 to aid in performance of inter-
national duties..

treatment of, at Bermuda..........
WALKER, NORMAN S.:

course during President Washington's administration.
treaty of 1794..

WASHINGTON, PRESIDENT:

construction thereof by commissioners..

enact neutrality laws at request of Great Britain
correspondence with Portugal.

principles recognized by that correspondence
what they regard as due diligence..

seizure of Spanish gun-boats in 1869.
character of southern blockaded coast

VESSELS OF WAR, (see Commission; Contraband; Neutrals :)
of belligerents, sale of, in neutral ports..
VIRGINIA, THE:

inquiries as to...

WACHUSETT:

his course toward Mr. Genet

made insurgent agent at Bermuda..
his urgent demand for coal.................

is supplied with coal by Fraser, Trenholm & Co

WESTBURY, LORD:

........note

...

his course suppressed privateering.

[ocr errors]

WILKES, ADMIRAL :

....

determines to restore prizes captured by privateers fitted out
in United States...

[ocr errors]

correspondence with governor of Bermuda.....

appointed Lord High Chancellor, June, 1861.
regards animus of neutral as sole criterion.

says United States may use Queen's proclamation to prove

animus

says ship should not be built in neutral port by belligerent
with view to war......

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

UNDER ARTICLE 1 OF THE TREATY CONCLUDED AT WASHINGTON ON
THE 8TH MAY, 1871, BETWEEN HER BRITANNIC MAJESTY
AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

GENERAL CONTENTS.

The case now presented to the arbitrators on the part of the government of Her Britannic Majesty comprehends a statement of the facts which that government egards as material to a just adjudication on the claims of the United States, and of some general propositions on which it intends to rely, believing them to be in accordance with the principles of international law and the practice of nations.

THE CONTENTS OF THE CASE ARE AS FOLLOWS:

1. A statement of the matter referred to the arbitrators, as it is understood by Her Britannic Majesty's government, Part I, pages....

II. An introductory statement of the events which attended and followed the commencement of the civil war in America, and of the course pursued by Great Britain and the other maritime powers in relation to the war, and particularly as to the reception of belligerent vessels of war into their ports and waters, Part II, pages..

III. A further introductory statement on international rights and duties; on the powers which were possessed by Her Britannic Majesty's government of preventing unlawful equipments; and setting forth the manner and circumstances in and under which these powers were exercised during the war, Part III, pages..

IV. Considerations proper to be kept in view by the arbitrators in entering on the
cases of the vessels specifically mentioned in the four following parts, V,
VI, VII, and VIII, Part IV, pages..

V. Statement of facts relative to the Florida, Part V, pages.
VI. Statement of facts relative to the Alabama, Part VI, pages..
VII. Statement of facts relative to the Georgia, Part VII, pages..
VIII. Statement of facts relative to the Shenandoah, Part VIII, pages..

IX. Recapitulation of the material facts stated in the preceding parts, Part IX,

[blocks in formation]

163-165 407-410 166-168 411-413

pages.

X. Remarks in conclusion, Part X, pages..

THR APPENDIX TO THE CASE CONSISTS OF FOUR VOLUMES, THE CONTENTS OF WHICH ARE AS FOLLOWS:

Vol. I.

Correspondence relating to the Florida, Alabama, Georgia, and Shenandoah. (See vol. I, pages 217 to 1002 of this edition.)

Vol. II. Correspondence relating to the Sumter, Nashville, Georgiana, Phantom Southerner, Alexandra, and other vessels respecting which representations were made by the Government of the United States to that of Her Britannic Majesty during the civil war. (See vol. II of this edition.)

Vol. III. Papers relating to the commencement of the civil war; proclamations and regulations issued by the governments of Great Britain and other countries during that war; the neutrality laws of the United States and of Great Britain; judgments delivered by the British Court of Exchequer and by the Supreme Court of the United States; correspondence between the Government of the United States and the governments of Spain and Portugul relative to the fitting out of privateers in the ports of the firstnamed country; and the report of the royal commission appointed to inquire into the character, working, and effect of the British laws for the enforcement of neutrality. (See vol. III, pages 1 to 395, of this edition.)

Vol. IV. General correspondence on the “Alabama claims,” presented to Parliament.

(See vol. III, pages 397 to 965, of this edition.)

PART I.

STATEMENT OF THE MATTER REFERRED TO THE ARBITRATORS, AS IT IS UNDERSTOOD BY THE GOVERNMENT OF HER BRITANNIC MAJESTY.

The government of Her Britannic Majesty, in proceeding to state, for the information of the tribunal of arbitration, the facts PART L-Introducand arguments which appear material to a just adjudication tory statement. on the claims to be presented by the Government of the United States, finds it necessary to remark, in the first place, that no definite and complete statement of those claims, with the grounds on which they are founded, has ever been furnished by the latter Government.

A general definition of them is, however, supplied by the terms of the reference to arbitration contained in Articles I to XI of the treaty of Washington, (8th May, 1871,) coupled with the previous correspondence between the two governments.

The parts of the treaty to which Her Britannic Majesty's government particularly refers are the following:

ARTICLE I. Whereas differences have arisen between the Government of the United States and the Government of Her Britannic Majesty, and still exist, growing out of the acts committed by the several vessels which have given rise to the claims generically known as the Alabama claims: and whereas Her Britannic Majesty has authorized her High Commissioners and Plenipotentiaries to express in a friendly spirit the regret felt by Her Majesty's Government for the escape, under whatever circumstances, the Alabama and other vessels from British ports, and for the depredations committed by those vessels: now, in order to remove and adjust all complaints and claims on the part of the United States, and to provide for the speedy settlement of such claims, which are not admitted by Her Britannic Majesty's Government, the High Contracting Parties agree that all the said claims, growing out of acts committed by the aforesaid vessels, and generically known as the Alabama claims, shall be referred to a Tribunal of Arbitration, to be composed of five Arbitrators, to be appointed in the following

manner:

ARTICLE II. The Arbitrators shall meet at Geneva, in Switzerland, at the earliest convenient day after they shall have been named, and shall proceed impartially and carefully to examine and decide all questions that shall be laid before them on the part of the Governments of Her Britannic Majesty and the United States respectively. All questions considered by the Tribunal, including the final award, shall be decided by a majority of all the Arbitrators.

*

RULES.

*

ARTICLE VI. In deciding the matters submitted to the Arbitrators they shall be governed by the following three rules, which are agreed upon by the High Contracting Parties as rules to be taken as applicable to the case, and by such principles of international law not inconsistent therewith as the Arbitrators shall determine to have been applicable to the case:

A neutral Government is bound

First. To use due diligence to prevent the fitting out, arming, or equipping, within i's jurisdiction, of any vessel which it has reasonable grounds to believe is intended to cruise or to carry on war against a Power with which it is at peace; and also to use like diligence to prevent the departure from its jurisdiction of any vessel intended to

« AnteriorContinuar »