Imágenes de página
PDF
ePub

Florence Miscellany. Afterwards they and a number of other persons, their admirers and imitators, began to publish their lucubrations in England, chiefly in two new daily newspapers, called The World and The Oracle; from which they were soon collected, and recommended with vast laudation to the public attention, in a volume entitled The Album, by Bell the printer. "While the epidemic malady was spreading from fool to fool," continues Gifford, "Della Crusca came over, and immediately announced himself by a sonnet to Love. Anna Matilda wrote an incomparable piece of nonsense in praise of it; and the two 'great luminaries of the age,' as Mr. Bell calls them, fell desperately in love with each other. From that period not a day passed without an amatory epistle, fraught with lightning and thunder, et quicquid habent telorum armamentaria coli. The fever turned to a frenzy: Laura Maria, Carlos, Orlando, Adelaide, and a thousand other nameless names caught the infection; and, from one end of the kingdom to the other, all was nonsense and Della Crusca." After this had gone on for some time, Gifford took up his pen, and in 1794, produced his 'Baviad,' which, in 1796, was followed by its continuation, the 'Mæviad.' It is only in these two poems that the memory of most of the unhappy Della Cruscan songsters has been preserved—an immortality which may be compared with that conferred by the Newgate Calendar. We may transfer to our historic page the principal names, in addition to those already mentioned, that figure in these celebrated satires-adding a few particulars as to some of them gleaned from other sources. A few of the writers, we may remark, that got bespattered in the course of Gifford's somewhat energetic horse-play, have

survived and recovered from his corrosive mud and any connexion they may have had with the Della Cruscan folly-such as the dramatists O'Keefe, Morton, Reynolds, and Holcroft; the younger Colman, who had already, in 1795, produced his Sylvester Daggerwood, besides other dramatic pieces; Mrs. Cowley, the clever authoress of The Belle's Stratagem; and no less a person than the prince of biographers, James Boswell, of whose Johnsonianism, however, people in general as yet discerned only the ludicrous excess;—not to speak of such rather more than respectable rhymers as Edward Jerningham, the author of numerous plays and poems; Miles Peter Andrews, famous for his prologues and epilogues, which were occasionally lively as well as rattling; and perhaps we ought also to add, in proper spirit of gallantry, the somewhat too famous Mrs. Robinson, who, with all her levity, intellectual as well as moral, was not without some literary talent and poetical feeling. Mrs. Piozzi too, of course, though not the wisest of women, must be held to have been by no means all ignorance and pretension. But the general herd of the Della Cruscans may be safely set down as having been mere blatant blockheads. Of some of the fictitious signatures quoted by Gifford we find no interpretation: such as Arno, Cesario, Julia, &c. Others of the names he mentions are real names. Topham, for instance, is Mr. Edward Topham, the proprietor of The World; 'monosoph Este,' as he calls him, is the Rev. Charles Este, principal editor of that paper; Weston is Joseph Weston, a small magazine critic of the day. Two of the minor offenders, to whom he deals a lash or two in passing, are James Cobbe, a now-forgotten farce-writer; and Frede

rick Pilon, who was, we believe, a player by profession. The more conspicuous names, besides Merry and Greathead, are Mit Yenda, or Mot Yenda, stated to be the anagram of a Mr. Timothy or Thomas Adney, of whom we know nothing; Edwin, which stands for a Mr. Thomas Vaughan, the same person, we suppose, who wrote a farce called The Hotel, and one or two other things of the same sort, about twenty years before this time; and especially Tony or Anthony Pasquin, the nom de guerre of a John Williams, the author of loads both of verse and prose. If we may judge by a collection of the 'Poems,' as they are called, of this Williams, or Pasquin, published, in two volumes, in 1789-a second edition, with a long list of subscribers, sparkling with titled names-Gifford's representation of the emptiness, feebleness, and sounding stupidity of the Della Cruscans is no exaggeration at all. Nothing, certainly, was ever printed on decent paper more worthless and utterly despicable in every way than this poetry of the great Anthony Pasquin, who, in quite a lofty and patronising style, dedicates one of his volumes to Mr. Pitt, and the other in part to Sir Joshua Reynolds, in part to Warren Hastings (so economically does he distribute the precious honour);—who has all these three distinguished persons among his subscribers, in company with most of the rank and eminence of the time;—and whom his friends and admirers, West Dudley Digges, W. Whitby of Cambridge, Thomas Bellamy, Frederick Pilon, William Upton, and J. Butler-all, he tells us, "of high estimation in the world of literature,”-in'a series of introductory odes and other rhyming laudations, extol as another Martial and Juvenal combined,-the reformer

of the age-the scourge of folly-animating the just criticism of Persius with a brighter fire than Churchill's"at once the Pride and Terror of the Land”—a Dryden come to life again-the greatest wit since Butler-a giant, magnanimous and proud, fit only to contend with giants. "Our children's children," exclaims Dudley

Digges,

"Our children's children o'er thy honour'd dust Shall raise the sculptured tomb and laurel'd bust; Inscribe the stone with monumental woe, While the big tears in gushing torrents flow!" "Resistless bard!" Pilon breaks out

"by every science owned,

Thou shalt be universally renowned !
Well may you tread all competition down :
Originality is all your own.'

But far beyond this is the fine frenzy of William Upton.

66

Pasquin!" roars out this idiot striving to get in a passion

66

66

Pasquin! Can nought thy daring pen impede,
Or stem the venom of thy critic gall?

Shall thy effusions make whole legions bleed,
And thou sit smiling as their numbers fall?

By heaven! I'll probe thee to the heart's warm core,
If Thespis hurl again his satire round,

E'en thy existence, by the god's, I've swore

To bring, by strength Samsonian, to the ground! "For know, that giants should with giants vie, &c." And afterwards

66

Imperious tyrant, doth my threats affright
Thy yet ungovern'd and undaunted soul?
Or rather fill thee with renewed delight,
Such as when Paris lovely Helen stole?

[ocr errors]

So much for contemporary praise—at least when esti

mated by the number and vehemence rather than by the true worth and authority of the voices! This man Upton, too, had published at least one volume of rhymes of his own, and no doubt was looked upon by many others as well as by himself as one of the poetical luminaries of the age. The matter we have quoted, however, may serve to give a right notion of the whole of this singular phenomenon of what the Della Cruscan poetry was, and also of the nature and extent of the celebrity and admiration which it for a time enjoyed. Of course, it could not deceive the higher order of cultivated minds; but even in what is called the literary world there are always numbers of persons easily imposed upon as to such matters, and at the same time favourably placed for imposing upon others; poetical antiquaries, editors, and commentators, for example, who, naturally enough, take themselves, and are taken by the multitude, to be the best judges of the article which it seems to be in a manner their trade to deal in, but who, in truth, for the most part do not know good poetry from bad, or from no poetry at all. Witness the manner in which about this very time some of the most laborious of the Shakspearian commentators, and other literati of high name, were taken in by the miserable forgeries of Ireland. No wonder, then, that Tony Pasquin too had his literary as well as fashionable admirers. No doubt his chief acceptance, and that of the other Della Cruscan warblers, male and female, was with what is (or rather was, for the phrase in that sense is now gone out) called the town-in other words, the mere populace of the reading world, whose voice is not, and cannot be, more potential for any enduring effect than that of any other mob; yet the

« AnteriorContinuar »