energy in varied technique which has passed since he wrote Atalanta the powers of the poet had steadily strengthened and matured. Under its austere form Atalanta pulses with the luxuriant exuberance of youthful romanticism. Its arraignment of the gods and most of its choruses are really as modern in temper as Prometheus Unbound. Erechtheus is a much more serious attempt to solve the problem which has fascinated many generations of poets from Milton to Shelley, from Landor to Matthew Arnoldthe problem of resurrecting in English the soul of Greek thought and imagination. In the case of Mr Swinburne the fascination was a fascination of opposites, for no temper could be less Greek than the Swinburnian temper. But there seems to be a principle in literature which resembles the principle of sexual selection. The artist sometimes instinctively seeks for his own antithesis and hungers after victory in alien forms. All the romantic riot in Mr Swinburne's blood clamoured for Greek severity and Greek restraint. Nothing is more remarkable in the phenomena of literature than this unconscious 'Argument,' written in prose as magical as that of the Authorised Version. Or take 'Anactoria' (perhaps the pinnacle of his achievements in point of form), or 'On the Cliffs,' in which he captures the uncapturable Sapphic cadence: Bid not ache nor agony break nor master, But of all Mr Swinburne's spiritual transmigrations Erechtheus is the most wonderful. Its cold austerity of contour, its pure sanity of style, its noble patriotism, its holy maternal heroism, its magnanimity, and its clangorous songs of storm and battle are all built up into an edifice of balanced beauty and symmetrical strength. The choruses in Erechtheus will never be so popular as the choruses in Atalanta; but in perfection of form and unity of spirit it is nobler than Atalanta, and indeed nobler than any other reincarnation of Greek art. economy of correction. The same tendency may be seen in Browning, whose Gothic grotesquerie and barbaric formlessness were always sprawling at the feet of Greek sanity and Greek beauty. The most paradoxical feature of Mr Swinburne's Hellenism is its co-existence with his romanticism. His imagination is Protean. He assumes the very soul of a period, and for the time sings as if he were a poet of the time. At one moment he is an Elizabethan dramatist, at another a Hebrew seer, at another a French lyrist, at another a Greek poet. His mastery of multifarious styles is unparalleled. The vivid Greek verses prefixed to Atalanta are followed by the no less vivid After Erechtheus the romantic temper reconquered the poet's imagination, and since then it has maintained its ascendency. This no doubt is partly due to the influence of the closer intimacy which sprang up about this time between him and the great romantic poet and critic Mr Theodore WattsDunton. It was in 1879 that the two friends became permanent housemates at The Pines, Putney Hill. They have lived together ever since. In these days when literary friendships are sometimes more perilous than literary enmities, the spectacle of a literary friendship which has endured for thirty years refutes a reproach which is often cast at the Republic of Letters. Though living so near London, Mr Swinburne is not of London, and his days pass serenely between the lintels of literature and life. Yet he is by no means the bookish recluse of popular legend. He sees many friends at The Pines. He is full of physical Spring speaks again, and all our woods are stirred, Shine forth and speak in season. Life stands crowned There is a friend that as the wise man saith Cleaves closer than a brother: nor to me Hath time not shown, through days like waves at This truth more sure than all things else but death, That washes toward your feet these waifs of life. Assuredly the poet gave his 'best,' for besides Tristram, in which the impassioned splendour of his lyrical genius culminated, the volume contains some of his finest sonnets (including the superb cameos of the Elizabethan dramatists) and that lovely nosegay of child-songs, 'A Dark Month.' In A Midsummer Holiday (1884), which was also inscribed To Theodore Watts,' Mr. Swinburne commemorated a holiday spent with his friend on the East Anglian coast. As this volume contains some of Mr Swinburne's most magnificent seaballads, a word about his passion for the sea may not be out of place. Doubtless other poets have sung the sea, but no other poet has sung it so spontaneously and so sincerely. Most of our poets, from Campbell to Kipling, regard the sea either as a stage for our naval heroes, or material for metaphor, or as a stock-pot of sentiment, or as a reservoir of rhetoric. Even Byron addresses the ocean as if it were a public meeting. Mr Swinburne was the first poet to escape from all these artificialities and to do for the sea what Wordsworth did for the land. His clean rapture in the sea is free from literary affectation. The glorious description of Tristram swimming is as written in the grandly spacious manner of the greatest poetry: And he, ere night's wide work lay all undone, Whose swift foot's sound shook all the towers of So clothed with might, so girt upon with joy, Like music mild and keen as sleep and strife: His face turn west and shoreward through the glad As examples of Mr Swinburne's later sea poetry, we may mention those magnificent ballads, ‘In the Water' and 'On the Verge.' Since the publication of A Midsummer Holiday Mr Swinburne has devoted himself mainly to poetic drama in the Elizabethan manner. In Marino Faliero (1885) he handled with great power the well-known story of the octogenarian doge of Venice. Faliero is a magnificent conception, and the stainless loves of Bertuccio and the Duchess are as pure and as fresh as the loves of Dante and Beatrice. It is indeed a curious error to imagine that the Swinburnian conception of love is solely or even mainly sensual. The truth is that in Mr Swinburne's poetry many phases of the love-passion are found. No doubt he seems to accentuate the sensual as distinguished from the sentimental side of love; and the explanation is to be sought not only in the poet's passionate temperament, but in his saturation with Greek poetry, in which love is an animal appetite like hunger or thirst. Further, his Elizabethanism leads him into direct locutions which are at variance with the modern taste for veiled suggestion. Stress is often laid on his Gallicism, but in point of fact his temper is utterly different from the Gallic temper, preferring plain, downright Saxon to salacious euphemism and suggestive periphrasis. The present literary convention is not likely to be permanent, and it must be said that Mr Swinburne's fearless candour is broader and larger and in essence more wholesome than the mawkish sentimentalism of the fading Victorian age. Chastelard is a poignantly true study of a young man fascinated by the selfish cynicism of a beautiful woman. Everybody knows that there are women who dominate men not by their nobility, but by their ignobility-women whose charm is a repulsive attraction. But Mr Swinburne shows other aspects of love. It would be hard to match in our literature the extreme exaltation and heroic purity of the erotic passages in Tristram. Here the love-passion is shown in its healthiest and wholesomest phase, a phase which stands midway between Greek animalism and Victorian sentiment. Since Marino Faliero Mr Swinburne has published three plays: Locrine (1887), The Sisters (1892), and Rosamund, Queen of the Lombards (1899). In addition to the volumes of poems already mentioned, he has published Songs of Two Nations (1875); Poems and Ballads: Second Series (1878); Poems and Ballads: Third Series (1889); Songs of the Springtides (1880); Studies in Song (1880); The Heptalogia, or the Seven against Sense (1880); A Century of Roundels (1883); Astrophel (1894); The Tale of Balen (1896). He has also made a volume of Selections from his poetical works. His prose works include George Chapman: a Critical Essay (1875); A Note on Charlotte Brontë (1877); A Study of Shakespeare (1880); Miscellanies (1886); A Study of Victor Hugo (1886); A Study of Ben Jonson (1889); Studies in Prose and Poetry (1894). He has also contributed to the Encyclopædia Britannica and to the leading monthly reviews many valuable critical monographs and essays. In his numerous studies of the Elisabethan dramatists he has done more than any writer save Charles Lamb to revive interest in the great poets so long overshadowed by the genius of Shakespeare. In many respects, indeed, Mr Swinburne is more Elizabethan than Victorian.. Like Ben Jonson he is 'passionately kind and angry,' and like Marlowe he is all air and fire.' No modern poet is more utterly born and more utterly made a poet. There seems to be no thread of prose in his nature. His imagination is perpetually incandescent, his poetic energy always at white heat. He sees everything in terms of poetry. He has no gift of prose compromise or secular conciliation. His intellect is worked by his imagination so swiftly that it seems uncontrollable; but in reality he is a perfect master of his vehicle. It is possible for a poet to be too poetical for his time, for in all save the golden ages of literature, poetry is a foreign language to four men out of five and to nine critics out of ten. Learning does not endow a man with the power of knowing poetry when he sees it. That is why so much modern criticism is preoccupied with the unpoetic elements of poetry -with its philosophy, its morality, its message to the age, its anecdotes, and so forth. Before poetry like Mr Swinburne's didactic criticism is dumb, searching in vain for the facile novelette, the easy platitude, the pious truism. He is a singer and nothing but a singer : He sings in music for the music comes. In Tennyson's just phrase, 'he is a reed through which all things blow into music.' This, far from being a defect, is a unique power, for he has made poetry almost as sensuously emotional and imaginative as music. It is with music that his poetry ought to be compared, for it affects the intellectual feelings not merely through the logical faculty, but mainly through the aural imagination. It rolls along in vast volumes of subtly modulated melody, in long, undulant waves of rhythmic harmony that elate and exalt, trouble and charm, thrill and enthrall the mind. It enters the soul not by the avenue of the eye, but by the avenue of the ear; not like the coloured song of Milton or Shakespeare, Keats or Wordsworth, but like the symphonies and sonatas, the operas and oratorios, of the great musical composers. Other poetry may be read by the eye: his must be read by the ear. Unfortunately, in modern times the habit of reading poetry aloud has died out, and most men in the presence of poetry are like the deaf at a concert or the colour-blind in a picture gallery. That is why the magnitude of Mr Swinburne's creative energy is unsuspected by students trained in the old didactic school. Bewildered by his manifold music, they charge him with masking his intellectual poverty under sonorous verbiage. It is strange that a fallacy so uncritical should pass for criticism. In sheer intellectual power of the imagination Mr Swinburne is surpassed by none of his contemporaries. The fact that his intellect expresses itself in so many new metrical forms proves rather than disproves its strength: for in his best work the conquest of sense is not less complete than the conquest of sound; the mastery of mind is as triumphant as the mastery of music. The quality of intellectual imagination displayed in 'Atalanta,' 'Erechtheus,' 'Tristram,' 'Hertha,' 'Tiresias,' 'The Hymn to Proserpine,' 'The Hymn of Man,' 'The Eve of Revolution,' 'Ave Atque Vale' (a threnody as fine as Lycidas or Adonais), 'The Triumph of Time,' 'A Forsaken Garden,' 'Hesperia,' 'The Garden of Proserpine,' 'By the North Sea,' ‘A Nympholept,' 'A Song in Time of Order,' 'Itylus,' 'Jacobite Song,' 'Cor Cordium,' 'Ilicet,' 'Christmas Antiphones,' and in scores of lyrics, songs, and sonnets, is of the first order. Full justice has never been done to the intellectual subtlety of such a poem as 'Hertha :' lyric is not verbal parsimony, but musical richness; When the hounds of spring are on winter's traces, Fills the shadows and windy places With lisp of leaves and ripple of rain ; And the brown bright nightingale amorous For the Thracian ships and the foreign faces, The tongueless vigil, and all the pain. Come with bows bent, and with emptying of quivers, Maiden most perfect, lady of light, With a noise of winds and many rivers, With a clamour of waters, and with might; Bind on thy sandals, O thou most fleet, O that man's heart were as fire and could spring to her, The light that loses, the night that wins; And time remembered is grief forgotten, Blossom by blossom the spring begins. The faint fresh flame of the young year flushes The chestnut husk at the chestnut-root. And soft as lips that laugh and hide The ivy falls with the Bacchanal's hair Her bright breast shortening into sighs; The wild vine slips with the weight of its leaves, It may seem superfluous to praise the metrical splendour of this immortal lyric, but one may pardonably dwell on the magical effect produced by the introduction of the couplet after the fourth line; by the choice of a dactyl for the opening of the second stanza instead of the anapæst used for the opening of the first stanza; and by the thunderous reiteration of the word 'fire' in the fourth line of the third stanza. It must be admitted that in rhymed iambic measures Mr Swinburne is often too diffuse and too alliterative. This is due partly to his training in dancing metres, and partly to his undoubted passion for sacrificing the demands of the eye to the demands of the ear. His habit of allowing the rhyme to master his imagination continually retards the imaginative περιπέτεια : For rhyme the rudder is of verses, With which, like ships, they steer their courses. Indeed, it must be said that no great poet has ever defied so defiantly the maxim, Ars est celare artem. He seems to reveal his art as carefully as other poets conceal it. But it would be absurd to suppose that he does so by chance and not by design. He doubtless deliberately accepts the loss in illusion for the sake of the gain in music. It is uncritical, therefore, to censure as insincerity what is evidently a deliberate means towards a definite end. The question whether the end justifies the means is a question of ear as well as eye; for undoubtedly undue servility to the eye tends towards metrical monotony as great as the metrical monotony produced by undue servility to the ear. On the whole, it must be allowed that Mr Swinburne, by vindicating the stifled claims of lyrical music, has enriched our poetry with an almost inexhaustible variety of new rhythms, new metres, new measures, and new rhymes. He has, indeed, no rival as a metrical inventor. As a specimen of his extreme subtlety in this respect, it is sufficient to cite 'Super Flumina Babylonis,' one of the many grandly sonorous metrical structures which he has built upon the prose cadences of the Old Testament: By the waters of Babylon we sat down and wept, That for ages of agony hast endured, and slept, Apart from its rhythmical beauty, this poem illustrates the Hebraic temper of the poet's genius. In prophetic grandeur and moral sublimity he is close of kin to the great Israelitish seers. His imaginative metempsychosis of the august Hebrew spirit is, indeed, one of the most original features of his poetry, and suggests a comparison with Milton's Hebraism which would, however, take us too far afield. Another marvellous feat of metrical creation is the Koppós in Atalanta, remarkable for rhythmical qualities quite different from those displayed in the poems already mentioned: Meleager. Let your hands meet Round the weight of my head; Lift ye my feet As the feet of the dead; For the flesh of my body is molten, the limbs of it molten as lead. . . Unto each man his fate; Unto each as he saith In whose fingers the weight Of the world is as breath; Yet I would that in clamour of battle mine hands had laid hold upon death. . . . Would God he had found me Would God he had bound me Unawares in mine house, With light in mine eyes, and songs in my lips, and a crown on my brows! . . . But thou, O mother, The dreamer of dreams, Wilt thou bring forth another To feel the sun's beams When I move among shadows a shadow, and wail by impassable streams? . . . Chorus. When thou dravest the men Of the chosen of Thrace, None turned him again Nor endured he thy face Clothed round with the blush of the battle, with light from a terrible place. |