Phillimore, Sir R.: his authority cited Portugal: law for enforcing neutrality of war with the Banda Oriental, course of the United States during.. his views regarding the powers of arbitrators.... his views regarding claims for consequential damages... Page. 20 35 44 210 222 Prerogative, (see Great Britain :) numerous examples of its exercise during the insurrection 149 examination of the United States Argument upon, by Sir R. Palmer.. Prevention : distinction between it and punishment 163, 165 395 474 32,149 the power of, inseparable from the idea of executive power.. 151 400 Prizes: The exclusion of from British ports no benefit to the United States .... 181 was voluntary and anticipatory.. 10 changed legal relations between Great Britain and the insurgents.. questions regarding should be decided by other Powers as they arise..... alleged illegal considered and defended by Great Britain thinks the Alabama and the Oreto a scandal and reproach... is informed by the insurgent agent of the purpose of the insurgents to de- 268 412 450 S. Sale: of arms and contraband of war.. Seward, Mr.: instructions regarding the indirect claims Shenandoah, the purchase of the Sea King.. 23, 265 190 115 enlistment of part of the crew departure from London... 115 115 is armed and manned from the Laurel information regarding, communicated to Earl Russell permission granted to coal and make repairs......... 116 117 117 118 Shenandoah, the-continued: the American Consul protests against it... partiality of people of Melbourne toward the insurgents the Colonial authorities informed of contemplated recruitments.. further proof of recruitments furnished the authorities... the authorities parley with the commander in place of acting. departure from Melbourne excessive repairs at Melbourne.. Page. 117 118 118 reasons why Great Britain is not responsible for the acts of, as set forth in excessive supplies of coal from the John Frazer at Melbourne.. the British Argument.... her armament defended by Great Britain. Mr. Cushing's observations on Sir R. Palmer's argument.. Sir Roundell Palmer's argument regarding recruitments for. Ships of war, (see Vessels, Armed Vessels, Exterritoriality :) their privileges in neutral ports, (Sir R. Palmer) no rule regarding their exclusion, (Palmer).. no distinction between those of a recognized nation and those of insurgents laws for enforcing neutrality of ............ treaty between the United States and, of 1819.. course of United States toward, regarding Cuba, justified Spanish American Colonies: course of the United States during their war of independence .......... negotiations of. Stanley, Lord : his views regarding injuries to the United States..... Sufferance. (See Neutral.) Sumter, the.. coals at Trinidad arrives at Gibraltar. 135, 293 136 136 136 138 135 37 34 579 610 79 143, 144 40 234 234 426 483 194 438 Treaty of Washington, (see Due Diligence, International Law, Indirect Claims, provisions respecting arbitration. rules of.. these rules the imperative law in this controversy. how the first rule is to be applied to the facts. Page. 14 14, 15 .146, 147, 443 146 how the second and third rules are to be applied the rules call for seasonable, appropriate, and adequate means to preserve 147 claims comprehending it Unfriendliness of Great Britain, (see Animus, Great Britain :) an element to be considered in preparing means to preserve neutrality . United States, (see Neutrality Laws:) 147 149 187 189 196 197 200 206 239 267 313 426 472 16 .18, 159, 257 157 210 100 100, 101 103 suffer great injury from aid furnished insurgents from British territory their neutrality law of 1818, compared with the British Foreign-Enlistment 148 162 12 13/ 28 29 .38, 40, 162 .40, 46, 228 43 161 218 410 their legislative history shows a constant desire to perform their duties as their history as a neutral compared with that of Great Britain. defense of the conduct of the United States Government regarding 185, 260 513 44 29, 40 227 220 |