PART I. METAPHYSICAL-ESSAYS, FROM BEGINNING TO PAGE 188; NOTES, ETC., PAGES 409-436.
PART II. RELATIVE TO TASTE-ESSAYS, PAGES 189-406; NOTES, ETC., PAGES 437 TO END.
ABSTRACTION, how far this process is necessary to the ideas of a Line, a Surface, a Solid, 62; Tooke's specu- lations regarding, 171, 172. Acquired Perceptions, 330, seq. Addison, quoted as to the love of colours,
205; as to the laws of art, 241; his taste, of what character, 363. Eschines, his noble encomium of De- mosthenes, 380.
Aikin, (Dr. John,) noticed as editor of Armstrong's poem, Art of Health,
Akenside, quoted as to the beauty of colours, 204; in illustration of the Sublime, 298, 308, 327; holds that Taste is an original gift, 339; quoted as to Taste, 361; as to the influence of physical science in lending beauty to nature, 396.
Alembert, see D'Alembert. Alison, (Rev. Archibald,) referred to in his Principles of Taste, 207, 208; adduced pluries for his explanation of Beauty on the theory of Association, 243, seq.; maintains that Taste is not an original faculty, 336, seq.; as to the faculty of Taste, 344. Amati, in reference to Longinus, 463. Andronicus Rhodius, on the title Meta- physics, 20.
Angularity, as an agreeable or dis- agreeable form in objects, 122, seq.; Animal Spirits, theory of, its antiquity and universality, 11.
Aquila Romanus, quoted, 46. Arbuthnot, or Swift, quoted as to the Sublime, 289.
Aristotle, on his work entitled Meta- physics, 20; his logic too limited, 48, seq.; his empire more durable than that of his pupil Alexander, 52; is the Brocard his-Nihil est in Intellectu, &c.? 123; on Aristoxenus, 147; as to his definition of Time and of Motion, 410; as to Definition in general, 411; quoted as to Beauty involving magni- tude, 233; in illustration of transitive epithets applied to Beauty, 250; the True is not always the Probable, 271; his description of magnanimity re- ferred to in illustration of the Sublime, 318.
Aristoxenus, (the Musician,) explains the soul by Harmony, 147. Armstrong, on his notion of Spirit, 165. Association of Ideas, inept as a general theory to account for the mental phænomena, 11, seq.; (see Hartley;) influence of, in education, 44, 46; in the production of the Beautiful, 207, seq., 226, 227; theory of, in its appli- cation to Beauty, 242-255; effect of, in making personal deformities agree- able, 364, 365.
Astrology, adduced in reference to the Sublime, 291.
Astronomy, a science of observation not of experiment, 29, seq.
Attention, influence of, in education, 46.
BACON, quoted to show that even his shortcomings or errors may be of use, 25; on the value of his ipsissima verba, ib.; his maxim that Knowledge is Power, vindicated to him, and illus- trated, 26, seq., 47; quoted, 38; his Logic, 40, seq.; not limited to physi- cal science, 42; on the art of inven- tion, 50; his peculiar merit, 52; how men corrupt philosophy, 146, 147; on physical metaphors applied to mental philosophy, 152; on the reaction of language upon thought, 172; quoted in illustration of the Sublime, bis,
Bailly, quoted in illustration of the Sub-
lime, 329; correction in regard to the quotation from, (Note NN,) 451. Baker, uses the word palate metaphori- cally for Taste, 346.
Bauzée, his etymological criticisms praised, 179.
Baxter, (Andrew,) his strictures upon Berkeley, 115; his conception of Matter, 140; upon the Primary and Secondary Qualities of Matter, or upon Perception and Sensation, 421. Beattie, his use of the term Psychology,
20; on the term Sentiment, 416. Beautiful, on, in general, 191-274;-I. in objects of Sense, 191-261; to what qualities is the Beautiful in sense ap- plied, 191, seq.; its primitive applica- tion to objects of sight, 191, 203; is it applicable only to the perception of relations? 192, seq.; that there is no common objective quality to which the term can be applied, ib.; how the word came to be applied to such dif- ferent qualities, 195, seq.; progressive generalization of the term from ob- jects of sight to other objects, that is its transitive extensions, 203, sej.; first ideas of Beauty derived from colours, 204, seq.; Beauty in the second place applied to forms, 205, seq.; to motions, 206, seq.; this Beauty is specially called Grace, ib.;
this enlargement of the signification of the word not in consequence of any common quality in objects, because though they all agree in pleasing, they please upon principles essen- tially different, 207 Beauty of regu larity, 209, seq.; Beauty of variety and natural Beauty, 211, seq.; Burke is wrong in holding that there is any common objective quality of itself beautiful, and that this quality is that of producing an agreeable relaxation, 214-218; the Beautiful in contrast to the Picturesque, 224, seq.; why and under what circumstances deviations from the straight line are pleasing? 226; Beauty from Utility, 226, seq.; latitude in the use of the word de- fended by the author, objected to by Burke and Price, 228, seq.; not op- posed to the Sublime, 223, seq.; does it involve a certain size? ib. how it stands to the Pretty, le Joli, &c., 233; Beauty from expression of intelligence, and especially of moral qualities, 247, seq.; as arising from Order, Fitness, Utility, Symmetry, 249, seq.; from Unity, (Note QQ,) 453, 454; as aris- ing from the most customary form, a theory proposed by Buffier and Rey- nolds, (but correspondent to that of Polygnotus,) 256-261; this theory cri- ticised, 257-261;-II. in objects of Imagination, 262-274; how the word becomes most general in its applica- tion to imaginary objects, 266; see
Belsham, favours the theory of cerebral vibrations in the case of Memory, &c., 8, 9.
Berkeley, his Idealism, 11, 85; as inter- preted by Diderot, 66; on Ideas, 70, 71; on his Idealism, in general, 87- 119; mistakes in regard to his theory, 87-100; a bona fide Idealist founding on the common sense of mankind, 89; his view of the Primary and Secon- dary Qualities of Matter, 113, 114, 115; his interview with Clarke, 418; quoted as to the Secondary Qualities, 430; on the notion of Extension, 431.
Bible, quoted as to the Sublime, 292, 300, 319, 325.
Biran, (Maine de,) see Maine-Biran. Blair, (Rev. Dr. Hugh,) his theory of the Sublime, that it involves mighty power or force, 278; holds that Taste is an original faculty, 339.
Blind are they insensible to Beauty? (Note S,) 437.
Boethius, on the Platonic Ideas, 415. Boileau, the True may sometimes be the Improbable, 271; quoted as to criti- cal envy, 379, 380.
Bos, (Abbé du,) quoted on the Pictur- esque, (Note U,) 438. Boscovich, his physical theory, 87, 93- 95, 106, 115, 429.
Bossuet, the sublime of, (Note NN,) 451, 452.
Boyle, on the instruction to be drawn from artisans, 45.
Briggs, (Dr. William,) taught Sir Isaac Newton the hypothesis of Cerebral Vibrations, 11.
Brown, ("Capability,") on landscape- gardening, 240.
Bruyère, (La,) adduced as to what he calls le gout de comparaison, 370; quoted as to admiration being a cri- terion of the highest taste, 374; as to critical envy, 379.
Brydone, adduced in illustration of the Sublime, 309.
Buffier, on his theory of the Beautiful, 256-261.
Burke, quoted, 112; his use of the verb to handle, 183, 184; referred to, 203; in regard to the Beautiful, 208, 212; remarks on some of his principles in regard to Beauty not in accordance with those of the Author, 213, 241; his principle rejected, that there is some common quality to which the epithet Beautiful may be applied, and also that this common quality is that which produces an agreeable relaxa- tion, 214-218; special refutation of his theory in regard to smoothness, 219, seq.; objects to the latitude in the use of the word Beauty, 228, seq.; wrong in making smallness a consti- tuent of Beauty, 233; quoted as to the transitive epithets applied to beauty in certain languages, 250; his theory of the Sublime, that it involves the Terrible, 277; adduced in illustra- tion of the Sublime, 309; praised as holding correct views in regard to the acquired nature of Taste, 354; repre- hended as excluding Fitness, &c. from the notion of Beauty, 358; on the character of his genius, 371; quoted as to the greater sensibility of Ima- gination in youth, 393. Butler, (Bishop,) on Locke's theory of Personal Identity, 60.
CAMPBELL, (Principal,) in what extent he uses the word Physiology, 19, 20; on what he establishes our expecta- tion of Nature's Constancy, 102, 103; on the words Sentiment, sentimental, 415, 416; quoted touching Etymology,
Campbell, (Thomas,) quoted in illustra- tion of the Sublime, 328.
Cardan, (Jerome,) in regard to Species,
Cause, the ambiguity of the word in Greek led to the fourfold division of the Aristotelians, 194. Cervantes, quoted in illustration of Taste, 343.
Chenevix, (Richard,) on chemical ele- ments, 14.
Churchill, quoted in illustration of the Sublime, 303.
Cicero, quoted in illustration of Reflec- tion, 56; on Aristoxenus, 147; on the metaphorical terms for Mind, 164; the meanness of an ethical system proves its unsoundness, 175; quoted in regard to the transitive extension of words, 199; as to the Beautiful, 227, 248; as to the Picturesque, 239, 240; in illustration of the Sublime, bis, 299; again, 312, 317, 324; uses the term Stomachus in our metaphorical sense of the word Taste, 345; quoted as to beauty from Fitness, &c., 358; quoted as to the encomium by Eschines upon Demosthenes, 381. Cogan, (Dr.) referred to, 11. Cogito ergo sum of Descartes, its char- acter, 58, seq.
Collins, (the poet,) quoted in illustration of the Sublime, 325, 328. Colour and Extension, their inseparabi- lity in thought accounted for by Asso- ciation, 245.
Colouring, on, (Note Y,) 441.
Common Sense, see Sensus Communis. Conception, what import given to the word by the author, to wit, simple representation, 262, seq.; subservient to Imagination, 264.
Condillac, his interpretation of Locke, 66, 121, 122; on his notion of Ex- tension, 431; approves of Locke's etymological metaphysics, 434. Condorcet, his interpretation of Locke, 123, 124.
Congreve, uses the word palate meta- phorically for Taste, 346. Consciousness, how far the French word
conscience corresponds to this, 56;
what is it? 58; to be discriminated from Reflection, 61, 433. Consummate, in connexion with the Sublime, (Note K K,) 449. Coup d'œil militaire, what, 336, (Note 00,) 452.
Cowley, quoted as to beautiful imagery, 266; in illustration of the Sublime, 314.
Criticism, cant of, or fastidiousness of Taste, 368, 369.
Crousaz, on physical metaphors to ex- press metaphysical phænomena, 57; on Perception and Sensation, or on the Primary and Secondary Qualities of Matter, 420. Cudworth, holds that the Intellect itself
is a source of ideas, 75, 415; that Moral distinctions are not apprehended by Sense but by Reason, 84; employs the term Common Sense in the meaning of simple representation or conception, 262.
D'ALEMBERT, on the proper use of the term Discovery, 43; on the Logic of Mathematics, 50; on the origin of our ideas, 78; our belief in the exist- ence of matter a species of Instinct, 111; on the French bigotry to old opinions in science, and to no- velty in matters of taste, 126, 127; objects to Du Marsais's proscription of Figurative terms, 173; his sketch on Synonyms praised, 179; on the Primary and Secondary Qualities of Matter, or upon Perception and Sen- sation, 421; on the Secondary Quali- ties, 430; approves of Locke's etymo- logical metaphysics, 434; on the change of the signification of words by extension, 197, 198; how far a sen- sibility to matters of Imagination is stronger in youth, 395; his use of the word tact, (Note PP,) 453. Darwin, noticed as a metaphysical ro- mancer, 7; on his metaphysical theory in general, 144, seq.; in regard to the origin of our knowledge, he certainly considered Ideas to be ma- terial things, and in this goes beyond Diderot, 144, 147; Ideas he regards as vibrations of the medullary sub- stance of the brain, 145; the doctrine that Ideas are sensible representations or pictures, he, with Priestley, &c., considers as mere metaphor, 144, 145; on the generation of the world, 147;
hails Tooke's philological discoveries, and the conclusions to which they are to lead, 174.
Davis, (Sir John,) verses in regard to psychological theories, 147; his em- ployment of the phrase Common Sense in the meaning of conception, or re- presentation, 262.
Definition, on the conditions and history of, (Note B,) 410, 411. Degerando, on the rage for simplifica- tion in the philosophy of the mind, 14; on Kant's Theory of Space and Time, 117; on the influence of Locke in France, 120; on Condillac's sys- tem, 122; on excessive generaliza- tion, 126; praised as superior to most French philosophers, 128, 129; his original text given, 432; alleged,
Descartes, his Animal Spirits, 10; his
cogito ergo sum, 58; his Innate Ideas, 73; sanctions the Ideal theory, 77: originated Berkeley's Idealism, 88; as to Definition, 410, 411; quoted as to the import of the term Idea, 413; as to his partiality for squinting from Association, 364.
Destutt-Tracy, his admiration of Con-
dillac, 121; his term Idéologie, 127, 128; on his notion of Extension, 431.
Diderot on Locke and Berkeley, 66; his interpretation of Locke, 125; quoted in regard to Beauty, 192, 193, 194.
Digby, (Sir Kenelm), on the materiality of our Ideas, 145, 426. Drummond, (Sir William,) as to his de- fence of the Ideal theory against Reid, 414.
Dryden, quoted as to the proprieties of the English tongue, 181; as to the Picturesque, 231; in illustration of the Sublime, 308.
Dutens, quoted as to the perception of beauties being a better criterion of Taste than the detection of faults, (Note R R,) 454.
EDINBURGH REVIEW, difficulties in the study of Mind, 24, seq. (see Jeffrey); Article by Dr. Thomas Brown?
Elements of the Philosophy of the
Human Mind, why interrupted, 3. Elevation, in relation to the Sublime, 278, 279, 291, seq., 317-321, 324, (Note
Encyclopedia Britannica, how the au- thor of the article Philosophy ex- plains our expectation of the Constancy of Nature, 104..
Ennius, quoted as to Sublimity, 291. Epicharmus, Sir William Jones contra- dicted in regard to, 108.
Eschenbach, quoted in illustration of the Sublime, 326.
Essays: these Philosophical Essays, reason of, 3.
Eternity, how sublime, (Note E E,) 445. Etymological Metaphysics, on, in ge- neral, (Note P,) 433, 434. Excellent, in connexion with the Sub- lime, (Note K K,) 449. Experience, according to Locke, all our knowledge originates in, 63, 134; can only inform us of what is, and not of what must be of what is actual, not of what is necessary, 135, 136. Experiment: experimental philosophy, 28, seq.
Expression, Beauty from, 247. Extension, notion of, suggested, 61, seq., 83, 114, seq.; see Space; how suggested, 419; on, in general, (Note M,) 431, 432; its notion presupposes those of Motion and of Time, ib.; Extension and Colour, their insepara- bility in thought accounted for by Association, 245.
FANCY, (Phantasia,) nearly correspon- dent to Imagination, 264. Fictitious narratives, a too exclusive familiarity with, tend to weaken our interest in the ordinary business of the world, 274.
Figure, notion of, suggested, 61, seq.; how suggested, 419.
Folard, (Chevalier,) adduced in regard to the coup d'œil militaire, 336. Fontaine (La,) quoted on Materialism, 166; as to Female Beauty, 246. Fontenelle, quoted, 118; as to the Sub- lime in Geometry, (Note H H,) 448. Forbes, (Lord President Duncan,) in regard to Second Sight, 428. Frazer, (Mr. John,) his explanation of Sensible Species, from his Discourse concerning the Second Sight, 427, 428.
GENIUS, does it adulterate philosophy, 315, 316.
Gerard, quoted as praising and criticis- ing Reid, 316; maintains that Taste is not an original faculty, 336, seq. Gillies, (Dr.) his vindications of Aris- totle, 123, 411.
Gilpin, quoted as to the Picturesque, 232, 237-239; criticised, 235; ad- duced as to the effect of the plano- convex mirror in surveying land- scapes, 269, 270; on the Picturesque, (Note U,) 438.
Girard, his etymological criticisms praised, 179.
Go to, on the phrase, 184.
Grace, or beauty of motion, 206, seq. Gravesande, on the hypothesis of Ideas,
413; quoted in regard to the term instinct, 429; praised and criticised, 430.
Gray, quoted as to the love of colour, 205; in illustration of the Beautiful, 250; of the Sublime, ter, 286, 287; again, 295, 298, 302, 308, 310, 325; in relation to a theory of Plato in re- gard to Taste, 370; as to admiration, a quality of true Taste, 374; curious violation of this in a criticism of his own, 379; seeming reversal of the effect of critical envy, 380; quoted on the pleasures of vicissitude, 389; as to the perception of beauties being a better criterion of Taste than the detection of faults, (Note R R,) 454. Gresset, quoted in illustration of Taste,
Guibert, quoted as to the military coup d'œil, 335.
HABITS, extraordinary rapidity of thought determined by, 333. Harbinger, adduced to shew the illu- sions of Etymology, 182.
Harpe, (La,) quoted as to the history of the word gout, 344; as to our judg- ments of Taste being in proportion to our general intelligence, 383. Harris, quoted against Sensationalism, 75; on Innate Ideas, 77; on the bro- card, Nihil est in Intellectu, &c., 123. Hartley, noticed as a metaphysical ro- mancer, 7; his theory of vibrations, 9, 10, 14, 15, 147; on his metaphysical theory in general, 137, seq.; a doc- trine of Sensationalism, 138; explains everything by Association, 16-18; in this coincident with Condillac and Bonnet, 139; not however a Materi- alist, ib.
« AnteriorContinuar » |