the preparatory electoral stage. But the inadvertence of
the State which let in the extra-legal organizations has
enabled them also to assume, in addition to those opera-
tions, the task of forming and co-ordinating the opinions
of the citizens, and they discharged it in such a way as
to make the elective régime and democratic government
miscarry
III. The extra-legal organizations try to found democratic gov-
ernment on the old party system, which is out-of-date,
artificial, and irrational. Theological and ecclesiastical
character of its conceptions. The advent of the régime of
liberty and of a complex civilization deprives the dualist
system of permanent parties of all genuine basis.
dualism is just as little founded in the human mind. The
methods of the party system are as artificial and reac-
tionary as its principles. The two modern practices which
it has introduced into its methods - popular election and
association: the first does but aggravate the difficulties
entailed by the exaggeration of the elective method; the
second, being applied on the basis of universal association
absorbing the citizen's whole personality, makes the volun-
tary and conscious co-operation of the members impossible 615
IV. How the party system, democratized in appearance only,
has warped the spring of democratic government by dis-
couraging, through the formalism which it set up, the
citizen's independence of mind, the energy of his will,
and the autonomy of his conscience. How this political
formalism allowed the weaknesses inherent in democratic
government to increase, especially the want of public spirit
which characterizes democracies. How it combined with
the economic and social conditions of modern civilization
and with the fond belief in their power peculiar to the
members of the sovereign people to lull the vigilance of
the citizen.
V. How the conventional notion of party has diminished the
strength of the power of social intimidation which con-
stitutes the great superiority of democratic government.
The weapon of moral constraint wielded by public opinion
has been wrested from the citizens and turned against
them by party loyalty. In any event, public opinion,
even when roused, asserted its power at intervals only
and in a repressive way; its preventive power remained
in abeyance. How, on the other hand, the conventional
notion of party has accentuated the weakness which is
latent in the power of social intimidation by allowing the
brute pressure of public opinion to weigh heavily on every-