The Protestant Resolution of Faith, being an Answer to three Questions. 1. How far we must depend on the Authority of the Church for the true Sense of Scripture? 2. Whether a visible Succession from Christ to this Day makes a Church, which has this visible Succession, an infallible Interpreter of Scripture; and whether no Church, which has not this Succession, can teach the true Sense of Scripture? 3. Whether the Church of England can make out such a visible Succession? [By William SHERLOCK, D. D.] 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 24.] Two other Copies. 4to. London, 1686. [M. 15. 14. (2) DISCOURSES ON THE NOTES OF THE CHURCH. MORTONI (Thomæ, postea Dunelmensis Episcopi) Apologiæ Catholicæ Another Copy. 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 12.] Syllabus. A Brief Discourse concerning the Notes of the Church; with some Another Copy. [M. 14. 21.] Examinations of Bellarmine's Fifteen Notes of the Church. 1. The First Note.-The Name of Catholic. [By Dr. Samuel 2. The Second Note.-Antiquity. [By Dr. Simon PATRICK.] 4. The Fourth Note.-Amplitude, or Multitude and Variety of 5. The Fifth Note.-Succession of Bishops. [By Dr. George THORP.] 6. The Sixth Note.-Agreement in Doctrine with the Primitive Church. [By Wm. PAYNE.] 7. The Seventh Note.-Union of the Members among themselves and with the Head. [By Dr. Wm. CLAGETT.] 8. The Eighth Note.-Sanctity of Doctrine. [By Dr. John SCOTT.] 9. The Ninth Note.-Efficacy of the Doctrine. [By Thomas LINFORD.] 10. The Tenth Note.-Holiness of Life. [By Dr. Thomas TENISON.] 11. The Eleventh Note.-The Glory of Miracles. [By Nathaniel RESBURY.] 12. The Twelfth Note.-The Light of Prophecy. [By Dr. Wm. CLAGETT.] 13. The Thirteenth Note.-The Confession of Adversaries. [By Richard KIDDER.] ! 14. The Fourteenth Note.-The Unhappy End of the Church's Enemies. [By Dr. N. STRATFORD.] 15. The Fifteenth Note.-Temporal Felicity. [By Dr. Robert GROVE.] The Use and Great Moment of the Notes of the Church, as delivered by Cardinal Bellarmine de Notis Ecclesiæ, justified. In Answer to a late " Discourse concerning the Notes of the Church.” A Vindication of the "Brief Discourse concerning the Notes of the A Defence of the Confuter of Bellarmine's Second Note of the (3.) DISCOURSES On Saint Peter, AND ON THE PRETENDED SUPREMACY OF THE POPE IN ALL CAUSES, BOTH CIVIL AND ECCLESIASTICAL. NECTARII Patriarchæ Hierosolymitani Confutatio Imperii Papæ in Ecclesiam, Latine reddita a Petro Allix. 8vo. Londini, 1702. [D. 7. 3.] DE JURISDICTIONE, Autoritate, et Præeminentia Imperiali, ac Potestate Ecclesiastica, deque Juribus Regni et Imperii, variorum Authorum Scripta. folio, Basileæ, 1566. [K. 1. 20.] DANEI (Lamberti) Tractatus de Antichristo. 8vo. Genevæ, 1576. [K. 8. 2.] CHAUNCIE (William) The Conversion of a Gentleman long time misled in Poperie: wherein is declared that the authoritie which the Pope of Rome doth challenge to himself over all Christian Bishops and Churches is unlawfully usurped. 4to. London, 1580. [M. 15. 37.] BILSON (Thomas) The True Difference betweene Christian Subjection and Unchristian Rebellion: wherein the Prince's lawfull Power to command for Truth, and indeprivable right to bear the Sword, are defended against the Pope's Censures and the Jesuites' Sophismes, uttered in their Apologie and Defence of English Catholikes. 8vo. London, 1586. [K. 17. 2.] DRAXI (Thoma) Angelica Præmonitio de fuga è Babylone; hoc est, Tractatio in quâ evincitur Romam Hodiernam esse Babylonem Apocalypticam. 8vo. Oppenheimii, 1614. [K. 18. 27.] SHARPE (Leonel) A Looking-Glasse for the Pope, wherein he may see his own Face the expresse Image of Antichrist. 4to. London, 1616. [N. 7. 55.] WIDDRINGTON (Roger) A Cleare, Sincere, and Modest Confutation of the Unsound, Fraudulent, and Intemperate Reply of Mr. Thomas Fitzherbert. Wherein also are confuted the chiefest Objections which D. Schulckenius, who is commonly said to be Cardinal Bellarmine, hath made against Widdrinton's Apologie for the Right or Soveraigntie of Temporall Princes. 4to. 1616. [K. 20. 15.] SALMASII (Claudii) De Primatu Papæ Tractatus. 4to. Lug. Bat. 1645. [F. 15. 2.] Salmasii (Claudii) Eucharisticon pro Jacobi Sirmondi Adventoria de Regionibus et Ecclesiis Suburbicariis. 4to. Parisiis, 1621. [C. 1. 14.] DU MOULIN (Peter) A Vindication of the Sincerity of the Protestant Religion in point of Obedience to Sovereigns; in Answer to a Jesuitical Libel, intituled Philanax Anglicus. 4to. London, 1667. [N. 6. 42.] BARLOW (Thomas, Bishop of Lincoln) Popery: or, the Principles and Positions approved by the Church of Rome (when really believed and practised) are very dangerous to all, and to Protestant Kings and Supreme Powers more especially pernicious and inconsistent with that Loyalty (which by the law of Nature and Scripture) is indispensably due to Supreme Powers. 4to. In the Savoy, 1679. [M. 14. 2.] : Another Copy. 4to. In the Savoy, 1679. [N. 7. 58.] THE JESUIT'S CATECHISM according to St. Ignatius Loyola, for the instructing and strengthening of all those which are weake in that faith. Wherein the Impiety of their Principles, Pernitiousness of their Doctrines, and Iniquity of their Practises are declared. 4to. London, 1679. [M. 14. 7.] An Exact Account of Romish Doctrine in the case of Conspiracy and Rebellion, by pregnant Observations collected out of the express Dogmatical Principles of Popish Priests and Jesuites. 4to. London, 1679, [M. 14. 13.] of the Church 4to. London, A Sermon preached upon St. Peter's-Day. By a Divine of England [Dr. PATRICK, afterwards Bishop of Ely.] 1687. [M. 14. 25.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 10.] The Catholic Balance: or a Discourse determining the Controversies concerning, 1. The Tradition of Catholic Doctrines; 2. The Primacy of St. Peter and the Bishop of Rome; 3. The Subjection and Authority of the Church in a Christian State: according to the Suffrages of the primest Antiquity. [By Samuel HILL.] 4to. London, 1687. [M. 15. 3.] A Modest Enquiry, whether St. Peter were ever at Rome and Bishop of that Church? [By Henry CAVE.] 4to. London, 1687. [M. 15. 3.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 10.] Sure and Honest Means for the Conversion of all Hereticks. [Trans. lated, with a Preface, by William WAKE.] 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 10.] BARROW (Isaac) A Treatise on the Pope's Supremacy. 4to. London, 1680. [B. 7. 17.] Dialogues between Philerene and Philalethe, concerning the Pope's Supremacy. 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 17.] Anothér Copy. 4to. London, 1688. [M. 20. 1.] St. Peter's Supremacy faithfully discussed, according to Holy Scripture and Greek and Latin Fathers; with a Detection and Confutation of the Errors of Protestant Writers on this Article. [By CLENCHE.] 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 21.] A Discourse on the Pope's Supremacy, Part I. In Answer to "St. Peter's Supremacy faithfully discussed," &c. [By Dr. N. STRATFORD.] [N. 8. 10.] COMMENTATIO ad Loca quædam N. Testamenti quæ de Antichristo agunt, aut agere putantur. 12mo. Amstelodami, 1641. [E. 17. 3.] (4.) DISCOURSES ON THE RULE OF FAITH. A Treatise, proving Scripture to be the Rule of Faith. By Reginald PEACOCK, Bishop of Chichester before the Reformation, about the year 1450. [Published, with a Preface, by Henry Wharton.] 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 6.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 16.] WHITAKERI (Gulielmi) Pro Auctoritate Sacræ Scripturæ adversus Thomam Stapletonum. folio, Cantabrigiæ, 1594. [E. 9. 21.] RAINOLDI (Johannis) Censura Librorum Apocryphorum Veteris Testamenti; adversus Pontificios, inprimis Robertum Bellarminum; qua tum divina et canonica Sacræ Scripturæ Autoritas asseritur solidissime: tum variæ Questiones et Controversiæ, tam dogmaticæ, quam historicæ, inprimis quæ est de Duratione Monarchiæ Persica et de 70 Hebdom. Danielis, expediuntur accuratissime. 2 tomis. 4to. Oppenhemii, 1611. [H. 6. 16,17.] USSERII (Jacobi) Historia Dogmatica Controversiæ inter Orthodoxos et Pontificios de Scripturis et Sacris Vernaculis. Digessit et edidit Henricus Wharton. 4to. Londini, 1690. [H. 5. 31.] TILLOTSON (John) The Rule of Faith, or an Answer to the Treatise of Mr. J. S., [John Serjeant] entituled "Sure Footing." To which is adjoined, a Reply to Mr. J. S. his Third Appendix. By Edward Stillingfleet, B. D. 8vo. London, 1676. [I. 15. 40.] Another Copy. 8vo. London, 1676. [K. 19. 18.] Nubes Testium; or a Collection of Primitive Fathers, giving Testimony of the Faith once delivered to the Saints; being a full Discovery of the Sentiments of the Ancient Fathers in the chief Points of Controversie at present under debate. 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 17.] An Answer to the Compiler of the "Nubes Testium:" wherein is shewn that Antiquity (in relation to the Points of Controversie set down by him) did not for the first five hundred years believe, teach, or practise, as the Church of Rome doth. [By Edward GEE.] 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 19.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 7.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1688. [P. 25. (7.)] A Vindication of the Principles of the Author of the "Answer to the Compiler of the Nubes Testium" from the Charge of Popery, in Answer to a pretended Letter from a Dissenter to the Divines of the Church of England. [By Edward GEE.] 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 9.] Two other Copies. 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 7. P. 25. (10.)] The Primitive Fathers no Protestants: or a Vindication of Nubes Testium from the Cavils of the Answerer. 4to. London, 1687. [M. 15. 19.] The Primitive Fathers no Papists: in Reply to the preceding Vindication; to which is added, an Historical Discourse concerning the Invocation of Saints, in Answer to the Challenge of Father Lewis Sabran. [By Edward GEE.] 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 19.] Two other Copies. 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 7. P. 25. (5.)] The Pope's Supremacy asserted, from the Considerations of some Protestants and the Practice of the Primitive Church, in a Dialogue between a ChurchDivine and a Seeker: in Vindication of Nubes Testium. With Allowance. 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 9.] The Antiquity of the Protestant Religion. With an Answer to Mr. Sclater's Reasons, and to the Collections made by the Author of Nubes Testium, &c. [By Edward PELLING.] 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 7.] (5.) DISCOURSES WRITTEN ON SCRIPTURE PROofs. The Judgement of Archbishop CRANMER concerning the People's Right to, and discreet Use of the Holy Scriptures. [Published, with a Preface, by Edward GEE.] 4to. London, 1689. [N. 8. 6.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1689. [P. 24. (11.)] CROFT (Herbert, Bishop of Hereford) A Short Determination of all Controversies with the Papists by God's Holy Word. 4to. London, 1679. [M. 15. 13.] Seek and you shall find; or a Search into the Grounds of Religion, together with some Queries, in order to a particular satisfaction, upon account of the various Opinions in this present age. 4to. London, 1686. [M. 14. 21.] Popery not founded on Scripture: or the Texts which Papists cite out of the Bible, for the Proof of the Points of their Religion examined and shewed to be alledged without Ground. [By Dr. Thomas TENISON.] 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 13.] A Short Summary of the Principal Controversies between the Church of England and the Church of Rome: being a Vindication of several Protestant Doctrines in Answer to a pamphlet called "Protestancy destitute of Scripture Proofs." [By Dr. Wm. SHERLOCK.] 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 11.] An Answer to the Request to Protestants to produce their plain Scriptures, directly authorizing their Tenets. [By Dr. William SHERLOCK.] 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 11.] The Lay-Christian's Obligation to read the Holy Scriptures. [By Dr. N. STRATFORD.] 4to. London, 1687. [M. 14. 21.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1687. [N. 8. 6.] An Answer to the "Address presented to the Ministers of the Church of England." [By John WILLIAMS.] 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 16.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 6.] A Clear Proof of the Certainty and Usefulness of the Protestant Rule of Faith, Scripture, after the help of Ministerial Guides, finally interpreted by each man's private sense. 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 9.] A Vindication of the Answer to the Popish Address, presented to the Ministers of the Church of England. In Reply to the Clear Proof of the Certainty and Usefulness of the Protestant Rule of Faith,' &c. [By John WILLIAMS.] 4to. London, 1688. [M. 15. 9.] Another Copy. 4to. London, 1688. [N. 8. 6.] A LETTER to a Lady, furnishing her with Scripture Testimonies against the principal Points and Doctrines of Popery. 4to. London, 1688. [P. 24. (8.)] |