« AnteriorContinuar »
some sort of creatures, but has also left out others as much
yer 4. When greater, when I judge, that this complex judged to reidea contains in it the real essence of any present the body existing, when at least it contains but real essence. some few of those properties which flow from its real essence and constitution. I say, only some few of those properties; for those properties consisting mostly in the active and passive powers it has, in reference to other things, all that are vulgarly known of any one body, of which the complex idea of that kind of things is usually made, are but a very few, in comparison of what a man, that has several ways tried and examined it, knows of that one sort of things: and all that the most expert man knows are but a few, in coin-' parison of what are really in that body, and depend on its internal or essential constitution. The essence of a triangle lies in a very little compass, consists in a very few ideas : three lines including a space make up that essence: but the properties that flow from this essence are more than can be easily known or enumerated. So I imagine it is in substances, their real essences lie in a little compass, though the properties flowing from that internal constitution are endless.
§. 25. To conclude, a man having no Idee notion of anything without him, but by false. the idea he has of it in his mind (which idea he has a power to call by what name he pleases) he may indeed nake an idea neither answering the reason of things, nor agreeing to the idea commonly
signified by other people's words; but cannot make a Bible wrong or false idea of a thing, which is no otherwise rest known to him but by the idca he has of iti v. g. when VOL. I.
I frame an idea of the legs, arms, and body of a man, and join to this a horse's head and neck, I do not make à false idea of any thing; because it represents nothing without me. But when I call it a man or Tartar, and imagine it to represent some real being without me, or to be the same idea that others call by the same name; in either of these cases I may err. And upon this account it is, that it comes to be termed a false idea ; though indeed the falshood lies not in the idea, but in that tacit mental proposition, wherein a conformity and resemblance is attributed to it, which it has not. But yet, if having framed such an idea in my mind, without thinking either that existence, or the name man or Tartar, belongs to it, I will call it man or Tartar, I may be justly thought fantastical in the naming, but not erroneous in my judgment; nor the idea any way false. More pro. S. 26. Upon the whole matter, I think, perly to be that our ideas, as they are considered by called right the mind, either in reference to the proper or wrong.
Se signification of their names, or in reference to the reality of things, may very fitly be called right or wrong ideas, according as they agree or disagree to those patterns to which they are referred. But if any one had rather call them true or false, it is fit he use a liberty, irhich everyone has, to call things by those names lie thinks best; though, in propriety of speech, truth or falshood, will, I think, scarce agree to them, but as they, some way or other, virtually contain in them some mental proposition. The ideas that are in a man's mind, simply considered, cannot be wrong, unless complex ones, wherein inconsistent parts are jum: bled together. Vll other ideas are in themselves right, and the knowledge about them right and true knowledge: but when we come to refer them to any thing as to their patterns and archetypes, then they are capable of being wrong, as far as they disagree with such archetypes.
CHA P. XXXIII.
$. 1. THERE is scarce any one that something
1 does not observe something that unreasonable seems odd to him, and is in itself really ex- in most men. travagant in the opinions, reasonings, and acțions of other men. The least flaw of this kind, if at all different from his own, every one is quick-sighted enough to espy in another, and will by the authority of reason forwardly condemn, though he be guilty of much greater unreasonableness in his own tenets and conduct, which he never perceives, and will very hardly, if at all, be convinced of. . §. 2. This proceeds not wholly from
Not wholly self-love, though that has often a great from sell. hand in it. Men of fair minds, and not love. given up to the over-weening of self-fiat-' tery, are frequently guilty of it; and in many cases one with amazement hears the arguings, and is astonished at the obstinacy of a worthy man, who yields not to the evidence of reason, though laid before him as clear as day-light.
8. 3. This sort of unreasonableness is Not from uşually imputed to education and preju- education. dice, and for the most part truly enough,' though that reaches not the bottom of the disease, nor shows distinctly enough whence it rises, or wherein it lies.. Education is often rightly assigned for the cause, and prejudice is a good general name for the thing itself: but yet, I think, he ought to look a little farther, who would trace this sort of madness to the root it springs from, and so explain it, as to show whence this flaw has its original in very sober and rational mind's, and wherein it consists. -$. 4. I shall be pardoned for calling it
A degree of by so harsh a name as madness, when it is
madness. considered, that opposition to reason de-' · Ee 2
serves that name, and is really madness; and there is scarce a man so free from it, but that if he should always, on all occasions, argue or do as in some cases he constantly does, would not be thought fitter for Bedlam than civil conversation. I do not here mean when he is under the power of an unruly passion, but in the steady calm course of his life. That which will yet more apologize for this harsh name, and ungrateful imputation on the greatest part of mankind, is, that inquiring a little by the bye into the nature of madness, b. ii. c. xi. $. 13. I found it to spring from the very same root, and to depend on the very same cause we are here speaking of. This consideration of the thing itself, at a time when I thought not the least on the subject which I am now treating of, suggested it to me. And if this be a weakness to which all men are so liable; if this be a taint which so universally infects mankind; the greater care should be taken to lay it open under its due name, thereby to excite the greater care in its prevention and cure. From a
$. 5. Some of our ideas have a natural wrong con correspondence and connexion one with mexion of
another: it is the office and excellency of ideas
our reason to trace these, and hold them together in that union and correspondence which is founded in their peculiar beings. Besides this, there is another connexion of ideas wholly owing to chance or custom: ideas, that in themselves are not all of king come to be so united in some men's minds, that it is very hard to separate them; they always keep in company, and the one no sooner at any time comes into the understanding, but its associate appears with it; and if they are more than two, which are thus united, the whole yang, always inseparable, show themselves together. 1 This con. $. 6. This strong combination of ideas, nexion how not allied by nature, the mind makes in made. itself either voluntarily or by chance; and hence it comes in different men to be very different, according to their different inclinations, education, interests, &c. Custoin settles habits of thinking in the
understanding, as well as of determining in the will,
$. 7. That there are such associations of
| Same antipa
thies an ef. men, I think no-body will question, who fect of it. has well considered himself or others; and to this, perhaps, might be justly attributed most of the sympathies and antipathies observable in men, which work as strongly, and produce as regular effects as if they were natural; and are therefore called so, though they at first had no other original but the accidental connexion of two ideas, which either the strength of the first impression, or future indulgence so united, that they always afterwards kept company together in that man's mind, as if they were but one idea. I say most , of the antipathies, I do not say all, for some of them are truly natural, depend upon our original constitution, and are born with us; but a great part of those which are counted natural, would have been known to