Justice in Robes
Harvard University Press, 2006 - 308 páginas
How should a judge’s moral convictions bear on his judgments about what the law is? Lawyers, sociologists, philosophers, politicians, and judges all have answers to that question: these range from “nothing” to “everything.”In Justice in Robes, Ronald Dworkin argues that the question is much more complex than it has often been taken to be and charts a variety of dimensions—semantic, jurisprudential, and doctrinal—in which law and morals are undoubtedly interwoven. He restates and summarizes his own widely discussed account of these connections, which emphasizes the sovereign importance of moral principle in legal and constitutional interpretation, and then reviews and criticizes the most influential rival theories to his own. He argues that pragmatism is empty as a theory of law, that value pluralism misunderstands the nature of moral concepts, that constitutional originalism reflects an impoverished view of the role of a constitution in a democratic society, and that contemporary legal positivism is based on a mistaken semantic theory and an erroneous account of the nature of authority. In the course of that critical study he discusses the work of many of the most influential lawyers and philosophers of the era, including Isaiah Berlin, Richard Posner, Cass Sunstein, Antonin Scalia, and Joseph Raz.Dworkin’s new collection of essays and original chapters is a model of lucid, logical, and impassioned reasoning that will advance the crucially important debate about the roles of justice in law.
Comentarios de usuarios - Escribir una reseña
No hemos encontrado ninguna reseña en los sitios habituales.
Pragmatism and Law
In Praise of Theory
Darwins New Bulldog
Originalism and Fidelity
Harts Postscript and the Point of Political Philosophy
Thirty Years On
The Concepts of Law
Rawls and the Law
Otras ediciones - Ver todo
Términos y frases comunes
abstract accept actually agree aims answer appeal argue argument assume authority believe better called Chapter citizens claim Coleman concept of law consequences consider constitutional controversial convention convictions course critics decide decision defend democracy deny describe descriptive disagree discussion distinction doctrinal Dworkin Empire equality example explain fact follow Hart hold idea identify important insist integrity interpretation issues judges judgment judicial justice justify kind Law's lawyers least legal practice liberty matter mean moral nature objection offer officials opinion ordinary particular past perhaps philosophical political position positivism positivists Posner practice pragmatism Press principle propositions of law protect question reason reflection reject requires responsibility rule seems semantic sense share social stage standards structure suggest suppose Supreme Court theory thesis thought tion true truth understanding University wrong