Imágenes de página
PDF
ePub

and which authorize the President to employ the military or naval forces of the republic to prevent such expeditions.

The bill did not become a law, as the Senate refused to pass it without consideration, and referred it to the Senate Committee on Foreign • Relations; and Congress adjourned without the committee having made a report.

The immediate effect of the bill, if passed, would have been to facilitate the dispatch from the ports of the United States of vessels to be employed by Chili and Perù in the war they were then carrying, on against Spain.

[blocks in formation]

POSITION AND DUTIES OF THE LAW OFFICERS OF THE CROWN IN ENGLAND.

Annex (C.)

As it has been necessary to refer from time to time to the opinions given by the British law-officers, it may be convenient to explain more precisely than has been hitherto done what is their position as the legal advisers of Her Majesty's government.

In England there is no ministry of justice, or similar department of state, to which recourse can be had by other departments when matters are brought before them on which a decision involving a question of law is required.

This want is supplied by the appointment of three law-officers, as they are called. Two of these the attorney-general and solicitor-general -are barristers, or advocates, with seats in the House of Commons, who have been selected by the ministry of the day, and who leave office when that administration is changed. They occupy, therefore, a double position as the confidential advisers of the government ou legal subjects, and as the natural defenders and expounders in Parliament of the proceedings which the government may adopt upon their recommendation.

The third law-officer-the Queen's advocate-is a permanent official, and does not leave office on the resignation of the ministry by whom he was appointed. It has been usual to select for this office a barrister who has a special knowledge of civil and international law; and he is, in consequence, more particularly the legal adviser of the foreign office. Like, however, the attorney-general and solicitor-general, he has private practice as an advocate, and has generally numerous duties devolving upon him in connection with ecclesiastical and civil jurisdiction.

The law-officers have no bureau or office set apart for their use, and no regular staff of assistants or archives. As the Queen's advocate therefore frequently possesses, from the permanent character of his appointment, a knowledge of official precedents with which the other lawofficers may not be familiar, he generally acts as their draughtsman in the preparation of reports. Up to the date of Sir John Harding's retirement the Queen's advocate's name stood first in the patent or letter of appointment under which the law-officers act; and he had, therefore, precedence over the other two. The result was, that papers on which an opinion was requested were sent to him first, and, when he had pe

rused and written his minute upon them, were passed on to the attorney-general, and afterward by him to the solicitor-general. In all cases of importance, and particularly when time is pressing, it is usual for the three law-officers to meet and confer together, after they have all read the papers, the appointment for the purpose being usually made by the senior in rank of the three.

Having thus shown the position occupied by the law-offiers toward each other, and toward the government, it remains to explain the manner in which papers are referred to them, taking as an example questions arising under the foreign-enlistment act of 1819.

By the 5th, 6th, and 7th clauses of that act the officers of customs and excise were empowered to seize and detain vessels in case of contravention of the act, in the same manner as vessels were seized and detained under the laws for the protection of the revenues of customs and excise, or the laws of trade and navigation.

The duties of the officers of customs being primarily for the collection and protection of the revenue, the collectors or other head officers of the customs at the ports are under the authority of the lords commissioners of Her Majesty's treasury, of which department the board of customs in London is a branch office. When, therefore, the consul of a foreign belligerent power has a complaint to make at a port that the foreign-enlistment act is being contravened to the prejudice of his country, he proceeds to the collector of customs, and lays before him the evidence he may have to adduce in support of the charge. This evidence is generally in the form of written statements, or affidavits, drawn up in proper shape, and sworn to, or solemnly declared to be true, before a magistrate. Copies or duplicates of these affidavits will then be forwarded by the customs collector to the board of customs in London, and by the consul to the diplomatic representative of his country.

In London the board of customs will transmit the affidavits to the treasury, and probably also take the opinion of their departmental legal adviser upon them. Some little time is consumed in the mere transmission of the papers, the custom-house being situated on the Thames, below London Bridge, and the treasury in Whitehall, near the Houses of Parliament, the distance between the two being about three miles. The treasury will next send the papers to the foreign office, and ask

instructions. In the meanwhile the foreign minister will have [154] recceived the affidavits and dispatch inclosing them from the *con

sul, and will likewise bring or send them to the foreign office. The secretary of state for foreign affairs immediately directs them to be transmitted to the law-officers for their opinion. This is done by writing a letter addressed to the three law-officers, and requesting their opinion upon the papers at their earliest convenience. This letter is taken to the senior law officer, either to his chambers or to the court in which he may be, or sometimes to his private residence; he, when he has read and considered the papers, either sends them on to his colleague next in order of precedence, (by whom, in that case, they are transmitted to the third,) or makes an appointment for a meeting to deliberate on the subject, in the mean time retaining the papers in his own hands. When all the law officers have had the opportunity of suf ficiently considering the papers, they consider, in consultation together, the draught report, (prepared usually, as previously stated, by the Queen's advocate,) and a letter is drawn up, fair copied, and signed by them, containing their opinion. This letter is sent to the foreign office, and the secretary of state is guided by it in the reply which he gives to the treasury and foreign minister.

APPENDIX TO THE CASE

PRESENTED ON THE PART OF THE

GOVERNMENT OF HER BRITANNIC MAJESTY.

VOLUME V.

PRESENTED WITH THE COUNTER CASE.

PAPERS RELATING TO THE FLORIDA, ALABAMA, SHENANDOAH, CHICK-
AMAUGA, TALLAHASSEE, AND RETRIBUTION; CORRESPONDENCE
OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES, AND

OPINIONS OF UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS

GENERAL, RELATIVE TO THE PRE

SERVATION OF NEUTRALITY,

&c., &c., &c.

Number.

[iii]

*TABLE OF CONTENTS.

PAPERS RESPECTING THE PROCEEDINGS OF BRITISH AUTHORITIES IN THE WEST INDIES.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

1 Sir James Walker to colonial Mar. 4, 1872 As to the visit of the Florida to Baroffice.

bados, and the circumstances under
which she was allowed to coal. His
letter to Commander Boggs, of the
Connecticut, was no more than a re-
quest to be furnished with reasons
which would justify him in acceding
to that officer's request.

2 Sir H. Ord to the Earl of Kim- Feb. 8, 1872 Denies that any partiality whatever berley.

was shown to confederate cruisers
at Bermuda.

3 Admiral Sir A. Milne to the Feb. 14, 1872 Correcting misstatement in the case admiralty.

of the United States as to the Nash-
ville having left Bermuda escorted
by Her Majesty's ship Spiteful. The
Spiteful was sent to prevent her
chasing United States vessels in
British waters.

Governor Leroy to the Earl Feb. 10, 1872 Replying to statements in the case of of Kimberley.

[blocks in formation]

the United States as to the conduct
of the authorities at Bermuda, the
amount of coal supplied, and repairs
made to the Florida and the Chicka-
manga. Amount of coal supplied
to United States cruisers.
Amount of coal supplied to the Nash-
ville. Evidence to prove that the
Chickamauga received no more than

35 tons.

6 Acting Governor Strahan to Feb. 17, 1872 Incloses memorandum in reply to the the Earl of Kimberley.

statements made in the case of the
United States as to the conduct of
the authorities at Nassau. As to
alleged partiality shown by the gov
ernor, and want of courtesy to the
United States consul
Memorandum inclosed in above

1

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

As to supplies of coal for United States
ships of war.

17

2.1

Transshipment of cargoes of vessels
running the blockade.

[blocks in formation]

The alleged mismanagement of the

[blocks in formation]

trial of the Oreto.

[blocks in formation]

7 Colonial office to foreign office. Dec. 31, 1861 Inclosing dispatch from the adminis

trator of the Bahamas, dated No-
vember 20, 1861, denying that any
munitions of war had been received
or shipped at Nassau for the Confed-
erate States.

8 Lientenant Governor Nesbitt Dec. 12, 1861 Alarm caused by the United States

to Commodore Dunlop.

vessel Flambeau, which keeps her
steam up in the port of Nassau.
Presence of a vessel supposed to
have munitions of war for the Con.
federate States.

26

269

[blocks in formation]
« AnteriorContinuar »