Conseguir este libro impreso
Acerca de este libro
Mi biblioteca
Libros en Google Play
III. GENERAL DISCUSSION OF QUESTIONS OF LAW:
Contention of United States regarding failure of Great Britain to main-
tain neutrality.....
Page.
17
Responsibility resulting from such failure..
18
Scope of the submission...
Meaning of the language "all claims growing out of the acts of the
cruisers".
Great Britain guilty of culpable negligence, even when measuring its du-
ties by the Foreign-Enlistment Act
19
Sir R. Phillimore's authority cited...
Legal theory of United States respecting questions at issue.
Sales of arms and contraband of war.
Dispatch of armed vessels.....
Responsibility of Sovereign for violation of neutrality
Constitutional inabilities caunot be pleaded in answer to a charge of
such violation....
Alleged constitutional inability of Great Britain examined
The prerogative power of the Crown
IV. MISCELLANEOUS CONSIDERATIONS:
Many irrelevant matters in the British Case and Counter Case..
Its treatment of the British Foreign-Enlistment Act of 1819
Its comparison between the British and American acts unjust
legislative powers sufficient for the performance of its duties as a neu-
tral......
The Government of the United States has always been anxious to possess
The history of the United States as a neutral a part of the British plead-
ings
The course of Great Britain as a belligerent toward neutrals
Orders in Council .....
Course toward France during the American Revolution
Course toward the Netherlands
General obligations of neutrals
29
32
36
37
38
40
41
42
44
45
46
48
49
51
52
53
54
55
V. STATEMENT OF SOME GENERAL FACTS PERTINENT TO THE INQUIRY AND
APPLICABLE TO EACH CRUISER.
Résumé of facts stated in the American Case to establish the unfriendly
animus of the British Government and people.
The facts stated in the American Case to be considered as proved...
The proofs submitted with the American Case of the systematic and of-
ficial use of British territory by the insurgents with the knowledge of
Great Britain
These facts also to be taken as proved..
VI. THE FLORIDA..
At Liverpool.
Information by Mr. Adams.
Action of Her Majesty's Government.
She was then evidently a man-of-war.
Character of Mr. Adams's representation.
Action of the British Government.
What might have been done.
What actually was done..
Registry of the Florida.
Clearance.
Résumé
Negligence of British officials.
What might have been done under the Merchants' Shipping-Act.
Arrival at Nassau..
Conduct of British officials there..
Want of due diligence....
Judicial proceedings at Nassau..
Partial and unfriendly conduct of the Colonial Authorities.
Seizure of the Florida..
Trial and release; the criticisms on these proceedings in the American
Case are sustained..
Armament of the Florida
At Cardenas, at Mobile..
At Nassau, January 25, 1863; receives coal, supplies, and recruitments..
At Barbados, February 24, 1863; receives coal and repairs..
At Pernambuco
At Bermuda, July 15, 1863; repairs and coals.
At Brest; receives recruits and new machinery from Liverpool.
At Martinique..
At Bahia...
Her tenders..
VII. THE ALABAMA
Her adaptation to war is not disputed..
The question to be decided....
Mr. Adams gives information respecting the Alabama June 23, 1862..
Referred to Law-Officers of the Crown..
Their action upon it....
Proceedings of Customs Authorities.
Mr. Adams informed that the American Consul may submit evidence to the Collector at Liverpool
The Consul directed to furnish information to the Collector..
He does so
Conduct of the Collector.
He declines to act.....
Mr. Adams instructs the Consul to continue to collect proof.....
The Consul does so, and presents it to the Collector, with a request to
seize the vessel.
Law-Advisers of the Customs.
** 212**2 888° 222 22273333288 28388820882888877499 ⠀⠀
Page
VII. THE ALABAMA-Continued.
Proof submitted to the Treasury July 22.
Also to Earl Russell............
Additional proof..
Opinion of Mr. Collier..
Presented with affidavits to Commissioners of Customs July 23
Action of the Board....
Further evidence submitted by Mr. Adams..
Her Majesty's Government agree to keep a watch on the vessel.
The Law-Officers think the vessel should be detained..
Illness of Sir John Harding..
Escape of the Alabama....
Inefficiency of the subsequent proceedings.
Earl Russell thinks this a scandal...
Mr. Cobden's views....
Want of due diligence; in what it consisted.
Armament from the Bahama..
At Martinique
Destroys the Hatteras.
At Jamaica, January 20, 1863; repairs and lands prisoners.
At Rata Island...
At Bahia..
Is excluded from Brazilian ports for violation of sovereignty of Brazil..
91
92
93
94
96
97
98
99
Notoriety of the construction and purposes of the Georgia.
Registry, clearance, and departure..
104
107
108
109
At Cherbourg
110
At Liverpool
Sale
IX. THE SHENANDOAH
111
General review of facts establishing want of due diligence.
The Colonial Authorities informed of the contemplated recruitments, and
do not prevent them..
120
Their inefficient proceedings..
122
Further proof of recruiting furnished to the authorities..
124
They parley with the commander of the Shenandoah in place of acting..
125
Contrast between the course of Brazilian and of British Authorities..
At Liverpool.... .
133
134
X.-THE SUMTER, THE NASHVILLE, THE RETRIBUTION, THE TALLAHASSEE,
AND THE CHICKAMAUGA.
The Sumter...
At Caraçoa, at Trinidad, at Martinique, at Cadiz.
135
$135
135-136
136
138
139
140
143
145
XI.-CONSIDERATION OF THE DUTY OF GREAT BRITAIN, AS ESTABLISHED
AND RECOGNIZED BY THE TREATY, IN REGARD TO THE OFFENDING
VESSELS, AND ITS FAILURE TO FULFILL THEM AS TO EACH OF SAID
VESSELS..
The obligation of Great Britain to observe these Rules was an
international one.
147
This obligation not affected by interual distribution of powers
of British Government...
Nor by the institutions or habits of the British people...
Great Britain should have used seasonable, appropriate, and ad-
equate means to preserve its neutrality...
148
Which should have been available as soon as required
British sympathy with insurgents an element to be considered
in preparing means.
Other elements to be considered..
The Means of fulfilling International Duty possessed by Great Britain..
Her Majesty's Government possessed full power for carrying out
its selected course of action.
Peculiar advantages of Her Majesty's Government for the exer-
cise of executive power.
152
Omnipotence of Parliament..
The duty of Great Britain in its treatment of the offending vessels AFTER
their first illegal outfit and escape from British ports...
The privilege of exterritoriality accorded to a vessel of war is
political and discretionary.
It should not be acceded to a belligerent not recognized as a
political Power....
153
The only remedy against such belligerent in a case like the pres-
ent is the remedy against the vessels themselves...
Great Britain ought, therefore, to have seized the vessels...
Due diligence, as required by the three Rules of the Treaty and the prin-
ciples of international law not inconsistent therewith...
154
After proof of hostile acts on neutral territory the burden of
proof is on the neutral to show due diligence to prevent them.
Diligence not a technical word....
"Due" implies seasonableness, appropriateness, and adequate-
ness
155
Objections to British definition of the term..
Judicial definitions by British and American Courts..
The United States do not desire a severe construction..
They do not propose to become guarantors of their people..
156
157
The Arbitrators the judges of what constitutes due diligence...
XII. THE FAILURE OF GREAT BRITAIN TO FULFILL ITS DUTIES, AS ESTAB-
LISHED AND RECOGNIZED BY THE TREATY, CONSIDERED UPON THE
FACTS....
No general means of immediate action provided....
No general instructions to maintain vigilance....
No officers charged with instituting and maintaining proceedings..
No steps taken to break up the hostile system..
The idea of an international duty toward the United States rejected.
The obligations of Great Britain were independent of steps taken by of-
ficers of the United States in Great Britain
Absence of such earnestness on the part of Great Britain a license for
the acts of hostility complained of.......
Failure to ascertain extent of statutory and prerogative powers..
Failure to exercise the Royal prerogative...
160
161
The Government of the United States always earnest to maintain its du-
ties as a neutral..
162
163
165
The Foreign-Enlistment Act was an insufficient means for performing
international duties, and its efficacy was diminished by judicial con-
struction and official requirements..
166
Contrast between this act and the American Statute as construed and
administered.......
167
British reliance upon the Foreign-Enlistment Act a failure of due dil-
igence
172
The neglect to amend the Foreign-Enlistment Act a failure of due dil-
173
Contrast between the course of Great Britain and the course of the
United States in these respects
Failure in due diligence after the escape of the cruisers..
175
In not detaining offending cruisers when again in British ports..
This obligation not determined by commissioning a cruiser.
In not excluding escaped cruisers from British ports..
The representations to insurgent agents respecting these cruisers were
so long delayed and so feeble as to amount to want of due diligence..
The British course in these respects was voluntary.
176
178
181
The exclusion of prizes from British ports was no benefit to the United
States.....
The responsibility of Great Britain for these failures in due diligence
continued until the end of the career of the cruisers...
182
No evidence of the exercise of due diligence submitted by Great Britain
What vessels are under the jurisdiction of the Tribunal..
XIII.—NATURE AND ÅMOUNT OF DAMAGES CLAIMED BY THE UNITED STATES.
These claims all comprehended in the terms of the Treaty.
186
187
2. Question of jurisdiction..
Great Britain contends that the claims styled "Indirect" are not
within the scope of the Arbitration..
188
The term "indirect" not found in the Treaty..
Rejoinder of the United States to the British assumption....
"Indirect,” as used in this controversy, is equivalent to "national"
The word "indirect," used in the negotiations which resulted in the
Treaty
189
Used in the same sense in this discussion..
What claims are within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal.
Résumé of negotiations respecting Alabama Claims..........
Liability denied by Great Britain..
Mr. Adams, November, 1862, asks "redress for private and na-
tional injuries".
United States refuse to relinquish their claims....
190
Many claims lodged during the war, but discussion deferred..