GLAND' HELICON, 1600, fubfcribed Ig "COME live with me and be my dea Upon the whole I am inclined to attribute the no The following fonnet appears to have been ( a great favourite with our earlier poets: imitation above-mentioued, another is to be DONNE's poems, intitled " The Bait," begin. "COME live with me, and be my As for CHR. MARLOW, who was in bigh Dramatic writings, he loft his life by a ftab brothel, before the year 1593. See A, Wood, 1. IVE with me, and be my love, L'And we wil all the pleafures pro That hils and vallies, dale and field, He mentions them both in bis will. } There will we fit upon the rocks, There will I make thee beds of rofes Α gown made of the fineft wool, A belt of straw, and ivie buds, The fhepherd fwains shall dance and fing IF THE NYMPH'S REPLY. F that the World and Love were young, These pretty pleasures might me move But time drives flocks from field to fold, The flowers do fade, and wanton fields Thy gowns, thy fhoes, thy beds of roses, Thy belt of ftraw, and ivie buds, But could youth laft, and love ftill breed, 。 15 20 5 XI. TITUS XI. TITUS ANDRONICUS's COMPLAINT. The reader has here an ancient ballad on the fame fubje& with the play of TITUS ANDRONICUs, and there is no doubt, but the one was borrowed from the other: which of them was the original it is not easy to decide. And yet, if the arguments offered above in p. 190 for the priority of the ballad of the JEW OF VENICE be admitted as conclufive, fomewhat of the fame kind may be urged here; for this ballad differs from the play in feveral particulars, which a fimple Ballad-writer would be less likely to alter than an inventive Tragedian. Thus in the ballad is no mention of the conteft for the empire between the two brothers, the compofing of which makes the ungrateful treatment of TITUS afterwards the more flagrant: neither is there any notice taken of his facrificing one of Tamora's fons, which the tragic poet has affigned as the original caufe of all her cruelties. In the play Titus lofes twenty-one of his fons in war, and kills another for affifting Baffianus to carry off Lavinia: the reader will find it different in the ballad. In the latter fhe is bethrothed to the Emperor's Son: in the play to his Brother. In the tragedy only Two of his fons fall into the pit, and the Third being banished returns to Rome with a victorious army, to avenge the wrongs of his houfe: in the ballad all Three are entrapped and fuffer death. In the fcene the Emperor kills Titus, and is in return ftabbed by Titus's furviving fon. Here Titus kills the Emperor, and afterwards himself. Let Let the Reader weigh thefe circumstances and fome others wherein he will find them unlike, and then pronounce for himself. After all, there is reafon to conclude that this play was rather improved by Shakespeare with a few fine touches of his pen, than originally writ by him, for not to mention that the file is lefs figurative than his others generally are, this tragedy is mentioned with difcredit in the Induction to Ben Jonson's BARTHOLOMEW-FAIR, in 1614, as one that had then been exhibited "five and twenty, or thirty "years" which, if we take the lowest number, throws it back to the year 1589, at which time Shakespeare was but 25: : an earlier date, than can be found for any other of his pieces and if it does not clear him entirely of it, fhews at leaft it was a first attempt. The following is given from a Copy in" The Golden Gar"land" intitled as above; compared with three others, two of them in black letter in the Pepys Collection, intitled "The Lamentable and Tragical Hiftory of Titus Andronicus, "&c.-To the tune of Fortune."-Unluckily none of these have any YOU dates. YOU noble minds, and famous martiall wights, Give eare to me, that ten yeeres fought for Rome, In Rome I lived in fame fulle threefcore yeeres, 5 My name beloved was of all my peeres; Whofe forwarde vertues made their father glad. For The earliest known, is KING JOHN in two parts 1591. 410. tal. let. This play he afterwards intirely new wrote,as we now kuve it. |