A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical ApproachCambridge University Press, 2004 - 216 páginas In this book two of the leading figures in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a 'critical discussion' serves as a theoretical tool for analyzing, evaluating and producing argumentative discourse. This is a major contribution to the study of argumentation and will be of particular value to professionals and graduate students in speech communication, informal logic, rhetoric, critical thinking, linguistics, and philosophy. |
Índice
9780521830751c01_p0108 | 1 |
9780521830751c02_p0941 | 9 |
9780521830751c03_p4268 | 42 |
9780521830751c04_p6994 | 69 |
9780521830751c05_p95122 | 95 |
9780521830751c06_p123157 | 123 |
9780521830751c07_p158186 | 158 |
9780521830751c08_p187196 | 187 |
| 197 | |
| 207 | |
Otras ediciones - Ver todo
A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach Frans H. van Eemeren,Robert Grootendorst,Rob Grootendorst Vista previa restringida - 2004 |
Términos y frases comunes
acceptability analysis antagonist approach to argumentation argument schemes argumentation stage argumentation theory argumentative discourse argumentative reality argumentum argumentum ad baculum argumentum ad hominem argumentum ad ignorantiam attack called into question communicative complex speech act confrontation stage defend a standpoint definition dialectical difference of opinion discourse and texts discourse or text discussion rules Eemeren and Grootendorst empirical evaluation explicit expressed fallacies first force ofjustification formulated fulfill Gricean maxims Grootendorst 1992 gumentation implicit inference procedure informal fallacies initial standpoint insights interactional intersubjective justification kinds language listener or reader logic means mentation Miriam normative obligation to defend ofa critical discussion ofjustification or refutation opening stage party performed philosophical principle propositional content protagonist put forward rabbi rational reasonableness regarded relevant resolution ofa difference resolving a difference retract role scientific second-order conditions speaker or writer specific speech event standpoint into question study of argumentation theoretical tion Toulmin unexpressed premise usage declarative valid violations