« AnteriorContinuar »
not defined in his creed, enwrapt in apocalyptic mysteries, evades his grasp it is only Astronomy that opens the mysterious expanse of the Universe to his eye, and creates an intelligible paradise in the world to come: wherefore, says Sir David, we must impregnate the popular mind with the truths of natural science; teaching them in every school, and recommending, if not illustrating, them from every pulpit: fixing in the minds and associating in the affections, alike of age and youth, the great truths in the planetary and sidereal universe, on which the doctrine of More Worlds than One must respectively rest - the philosopher scanning with a new sense the sphere in which he is to study; and the Christian the temples in which he is to worship.-Such, in his own words, is Sir David Brewster's final and authoritative exposition of the CREED of the philosopher, and the HOPE of the Christian:-of such a nature are to be the new heavens and the new earth wherein dwelleth righteousness; and such, henceforth, as he has indicated, becomes the duty of the Christian teacher in the Family, in the School, in the Pulpit! So absolutely and irrefragably, it seems, are demonstrated the stupendous facts of astronomical science on which this Creed and this Faith depend: so unerring are our telescopes and other instruments, that he who does not receive this "Creed" is no philosopher, nor he who rejects the "Hope " a Christian. But, in the mean time, how inconceivably embarrassing to such a philosopher, and to such a Christian, is the possibility that many, or a few years hence, such immense improvements may be made in telescopes, or in other modes of acquiring a knowledge of the celestial structures, as to demonstrate to the sense, as well as reason, of us impatient and presumptuous tenants of the earth, that the planets are not inhabited! that the fixed stars are not suns, and have not a planet a-piece no, not even a solitary planet among them! Thus rendering our astounded and dismayed philosopher homeless and creedless, and the Christian helpless and hope
Romans, i. 22.
less-the former one of those who professing themselves to be wise become fools;* the latter, likened unto a foolish man which built his house upon the sand. †
The "Future" of the Essayist is of a different kind, and adumbrated with becoming humility and diffidence. “I did not," he says, "venture further than to intimate, that when we are taught, that as we have borne the image of the Earthy, we shall also bear the image of the Heavenly, we may find, in even natural science, reasons for opening our minds to the reception of the cheering and elevating announcement."‡
We have now placed before our readers the substance of the arguments for and against a plurality of worlds, so far as developed in the essays of Dr Whewell and Sir David Brewster. The former is a work so replete with subtle thought, bold speculation, and knowledge of almost every kind, used with extraordinary force and dexterity, as to challenge the patient and watchful attention of the most thoughtful reader; and that whether he be, or be not, versed in astronomical speculations. Great as are the power and resources of the author, we detect no trace of dogmatism or arrogance, but, on the contrary, a true spirit of fearless, but patient and candid, inquiry. It is a mighty problem of which he proposes a solution, and he does no more than propose it: in his Preface declaring that, to himself at least, his arguments "appear to be of no small philosophical force, though he is quite ready to weigh carefully and candidly any answer which may be offered to them."
We feel grateful to the accomplished Essayist for the storehouse of authentic facts, and the novel combination of inferences from them, with which he has presented us; and we are not aware that he has given us just reason to regret confiding in his correctness or candour. And in travelling with him through his vast and chequered course, we feel that we have accompanied not only the philosopher and the divine, but the gentleman: one who, while manifestly knowing Matthew, vii. 26.
+ Dialogue, p. 74.
what is due to himself, as manifestly selves, intellectually and morally, then respects his intelligent reader. In it is that both philosophy and religion several of his astronomical assump- concur in rebuking us, and enjoining a tions and inferences we may be unable reverent diffidence. We have probably to concar, particularly in respect of read as much on these subjects as the nebulous stars. We may also well many of our readers, and that with falter at expressing a decisive “Aye" deep interest and attention ; but we or “ No," to the great question pro- never met with so cogent a demonposed by him for discussion, on scien- stration as is contained in this Essay, tific grounds, and independently of of the theological difficulties besetting Scriptural Revelation; yet we acknow- the popular doctrine of a plurality of ledge that he has sensibly shaken our worlds. Had God vouchsafed to tell opinion as to the validity of the rea- us that it was so, there would have sons usually assigned for believing in been an end of the matter, and with a plurality of worlds. He remorse- it all difficulty would have disappeared, lessly ties us down to EVIDENCE, as to one whose whole life, as the Chrishe ought to do; and all the more tian's ought to be, is one continued rigorously, because the affirmative act of faith ; but God has thought fit conclusion, at which many heedless to preserve an awful silence concernpersons are disposed to jump, is one ing his dealings with other scenes of which, if well founded, occasions reli- physical existence: while He has as gious difficulties of a grave character distinctly revealed that of spiritual among the profoundest and perhaps beings whose functions are vitally even devoutest thinkers. To suppose connected with man, as he exists upon that Omnipotence may not have peo- the earth, the subject of a sublime pled already, or contemplate a future economy, which, we are assured by peopling of the starry spheres with Inspiration, that the angels desire to intelligent beings, of as different a look into. The Christian implicitly bekind and order as it is possible for lieves that there is a HEAVEN, where our limited faculties to conceive, yet the presence of the adorable Deity in some way involved in physical constitutes happiness, to the most conditions, altogether inexplicable to exalted of His ministers and servants, us, would be the acme of impious pre- perfect and ineffable: happiness in sumption. When we look at Sirius, which He has solemnly assured us in his solitary splendour in the mid- that we may hereafter participate : night sky, pouring forth possibly fifty for since the beginning of the world, times the light and heat of our sun, men have not heard, nor perceived by upon a prodigiously greater planetary the ear, neither hath the eye seen, O system than our own, it is natural to God, beside Thee, what He hath preconjecture whether, among many other pared for him that waiteth for Him. * possibilities, it may be the seat of in- This, our Maker bas told us ; he has telligence, perhaps of a transcendent not told us the other, nor anything character. Here the imagination may about it: no, not when He visited the disport itself as it pleasez : yet we earth, unless we can dimly see such a shall feel ourselves compelled—those significance in the words, “In my who can think about the matter-to Father's house (oixia) are many manown, that our imaginations are, as it sions (uovai): if it were not so, I were, “cabined, cribbed, confined,” by would have told you. I go to prethe objects and associations to which pare a place (Tónov) for you.” The we are at present restricted ; and as word porn is used twice in the New the late eminent Prussian astronomer, Testament, and in the same chapter:t Bessel, observed, those who imagine in the verse already quoted, and in the inhabitants in the moon and planets, 230—“If a man love me, he will keep “supposed them, in spite of all their my words: and my Father will love protestations, as like to men, as one him, and we will come unto him, and egg to another.” But when we pro- make our abode (uovny) with him." ceed further, and insist on likening Here are the three words in the same these supposed inbabitants to our.. verse, oίκια, μονη, τοπος. Ιn my Father's
Isaiah, lxiv. 4 ; 1 Cor. ii. 9.
+ John, xiv. 2, 23.
nouse there are μovai moλλaì, many places of abode. Heaven is the oikia, our common place, and it has many subdivisions, room enough for angels, as well as for the spirits of just men made perfect. It is possibly an allusion to the temple, God's earthly house, which had many chambers in it. But who shall require us to believe that this μovn, was a star, or planet? It may be so, it may not; there can be no sin in a devout mind conjecturing on the subject; but the Essayist does not meddle with these solemn topics: confining himself to the physical reasons for conjecturing, with more or less probability, that the stars are habitations for human beings. We take our leave of him with a quotation from his Dialogue, couched in grave and dignified terms:
"U. But your arguments are merely negative. You prove only that we do not know the planets to be inhabited.
"Z. If, when I have proved that point, men were to cease to talk as if they knew that the planets are inhabited, I should have produced a great effect.
"U. Your basis is too narrow for so vast a superstructure, as that all the rest of the universe, besides the earth, is uninhabited.
"Z. Perhaps; for my philosophical basis is only the earth-the only known habitation. But on this same narrow basis, the earth, you build up a superstructure that other bodies ARE inhabited. What I do is, to show that each part of your structure is void of tenacity, and cannot stand.
"It is probable that when we have reduced to their real value all the presumptions drawn from physical reasoning, for the opinion of planets and stars being either inhabited, or uninhabited, the face of these will be perceived to be so small, that the belief of all thoughtful persons on this subject will be determined by moral, metaphysical, and theological consideration."
"More Worlds than One" will not, we are constrained to say, in our opinion, add to the well-earned reputation of Sir David Brewster. It is a basty and slight performance, entirely of a popular character; and disfigured throughout, not only by an overweening confidence and peremptoriness of assertion, but by tinges of per
Dialogue, p. 42.
sonality and outbursts of heat that are indeed strange disturbing forces in a philosophical discussion. Dr Whewell's Essay is a work requiring, in a worthy answer, great consideration; and we do not think that "More Worlds than One" evidences a tithe of such consideration. Nor does Sir David show a proper respect for his opponent; nor has he taken a proper measure of his formidable proportions as a logical and scientific disputant, one who should be answered in a cold and exact spirit; or it were much better to leave him alone. Sir David must forgive us if we quote a sentence or two from devout old John Wesley, a man who had several points of greatness in him :
Fontenelle has much to answer for, if we may judge from what has been said concerning the extent and nature of the influence he has exercised on thoughtless minds. That flippant but brilliant trifler, Horace Walpole, for instance, declared that the reading Fontenelle had made him a sceptic! He maintained, on the supposition of a plurality of worlds, the impossibility of any revelation! That the reception of this opinion was sufficient, with him, to destroy the credibility of all revelation! This ground he has, if this report be true, the honour of occupying with Thomas Paine.
Let us, however, think and speak and act differently, remembering fearfully, how often the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. Is it, indeed, consistent with even mere Wisdom of God in the Worlds of Creation, vol. iii. p. 265. Monthly Magazine, A.D. 1798-art. "Walpoliana.”.
"Be not so positive, especially with regard to things which are neither easy, nor necessary to be determined. When I was young, I was sure of everything. In a few years, having been mistaken a thousand times, I was not half so sure of most things as before. At present, I am hardly sure of anything, but what God has revealed to me! . . . Upon the whole, an ingenious man may easily flourish on this head. How much more glorious is it for the great God to have created innumerable worlds than this little globe only!
. . Do you ask, then, what is This Spot to the great God? Why, as much as millions of systems. GREAT and LITTLE have place with regard to us; but before Him, they vanish away!" +
gious history of these planetary regions. He had not ascertained what visits of communication they received from the God who upholds them. But he knew that the fact of a Real Visit to THIS PLANET had such evidence to rest upon that it was not to be disposted by any aerial imagination." Let this noble and devout spirit be in us: both Faith and Reason assuring as, that we stand, in Scriptural Truth, safe and immovable, like a wise man, which built his house upon a rock.
or warmer wishes for its success. Twenty-two years have now elapsed since Greece became a kingdom under the sceptre of Prince Otho of Bavaria. He was then a minor, and he was selected to fill the new throne more for his father's merits than from any promise of superior talent in his own person. King Louis of Bavaria loved art, and his want of political capacity and military power removed any feelings of jealousy on the part of the greater powers in Europe to the addition thus made to the dignity of the house of Wittelsbach. King Otho was known to be a youth of very moderate attainments; but his natural deficiencies being fortunately united to an amiable disposition, it was expected that he would prove a docile monarch, and listen to good counsellors. It has proved otherwise. His limited capacity has not been more remarkable than his obstinacy and perverseness in following a line of policy which has inflicted serious injury on Greece. Notwithstanding a natural love of justice, and a good moral character, his misgovernment has degenerated into corruption, though it has not assumed a character of systematic tyranny. On the whole, his incapacity to perform the duties of his station, and his silly eagerness to assume the appearance of being a despotic sovereign, while he was unable to make any use of the greater part of the prerogatives willingly conceded to him by his subjects, have made him a very apt regal type of the anarchical and rapacious nation he
worldly wisdom, on the ground of an assumption with regard to inhabited planets, to reject a belief founded on direct and positive proofs, such as is the belief in the truths of Natural and Revealed Religion?
"Newton," says Dr Chalmers, in his discourse on the Modesty of True Science, "knew the boundary which hemmed him. He knew that he had not thrown one particle of light on the moral or reli
KING OTHO AND HIS CLASSIC KINGDOM.
THE actual condition of Greece is a disgrace to the political civilisation of Europe. There is hope for the Othoman Empire, for the Turks are sensible that they have much to learn; but for the kingdom of Greece there is no hope, unless the modern Hellenes lay aside the self-conceit which induces them to boast of their superior orthodoxy when the question relates to their practical ignorance. Englishmen and Russians, despots and demagogues, princes and people, Europeans and Americans, all agree in pronouncing King Otho's kingdom a satire on monarchical institutions, constitutional legislation, and central administration. The valour and patriotism displayed by the Albanians of Suli and Hydra, and by the Greeks of Messolonghi and Psara, were the theme of well-merited praise, and were rewarded by liberal gifts of money and other supplies from the friends of Greece in Germany, Switzerland, France, England, and the United States of America. Greece has great obligations to the people of Western Europe, whom she now stigmatises as hostile Latins. It was the voice of the people that moved the Cabinet of London to take the initiative in the negotiations which caused the battle of Navarino, and conferred on Greece the rank of an independent kingdom by the treaty of 1832.
No political experiment during the present century-fruitful as the period has been in producing new States-excited higher expectations
VOL. LXXVI.-NO. CCCCLXVIII.
* Matthew, vii. 24.
rules. The result is, that the hopes of ardent Philhellenes, the expectations of enthusiastic scholars, and the wishes of cautious statesmen, have all been utterly disappointed by the government of King Otho. More than this, while the King of Greece has shown himself a bad monarch, the Greeks have displayed extreme ignorance in all their attempts to supply his deficiencies. Instead of suggesting better principles for his guidance, they have become the steady supporters of his system whenever he condescended to purchase their support by places and pensions. It seems as if the Bavarian monarchy had infused a morbid lethargy into Romaic society, so rapidly has the central administration of Athens quenched the fervour of patriotism throughout liberated Greece. The Albanian population has lost its valour and perseverance; the Greek has sunk back into that normal condition of rapacious imbecility which has characterised the Hellenic race ever since the time of Mummius.
The revolution which freed Greece from the Turkish yoke broke out early in the year 1821, so that the inhabitants of the kingdom have now enjoyed the advantages of political independence for thirty-three years. A generation has grown up to manhood in possession of a greater degree of freedom than is possessed by most of the continental nations of Europe. Municipal institutions existed, to some extent, under the Turks, and they acquired considerable importance during the revolutionary war. The fullest exercise of the liberty of the press has prevailed ever since the first year of the revolution. Nor has this liberty been greatly abused, though it has often been misused-a circumstance not to be wondered at in a country so torn by faction as Greece has been ever since she commenced her struggle for independence. This fact must be weighed against the many vices and corruptions of the Greeks which it will be our task to notice, for it affords decisive evidence that there still exists among the mass of the population a sound basis of public opinion.
The establishment of free and orthodox Greece as an independent te, under the protection of Great in, France, and Russia, was a
conception of George Canning's genius, and it received the sanction of the Duke of Wellington. After Canning's death, his enemies made it a subject of reproach. It is said that, when his statue was erected in Palace Yard, a royal duke, walking beside it with the late Lord Eldon, began to pour out a diatribe of harmless accusations against the honoured dead, which he summed up, saying, "He caused the battle of Navarin, Eldon, and he was not nearly so big as that statue;" to which the great Lord Chancellor, whose patience had been long tried, expanded his bushy eyebrows, and exclaimed, "No, truly-nor so green:" the statue being then, as some of our readers may remember, more remarkable for the verdant colour of its patent verdigris than for its size. Whether the battle of Navarin was absolutely necessary to save Greece from Ibrahim Pasha and his Arabs, may still admit of dispute; but unquestionably it was the battle of Navarin which did save Greece. When, however, the business of selecting a king, and of organising the institutions of a central administration on monarchical principles came to be performed, the genius of Canning was represented by the torpor of Aberdeen, and the sagacity of Wellington by the belligerent amenity of Palmerston.
The Russian sympathies of Capodistrias succeeded in delaying the final settlement of the Greek question, with the hope of placing Greece in a state of vassalage to the Czar. Lord Aberdeen combated the policy of the Corfiote feebly and unsuccessfully. He barely succeeded in preventing the execution of the Russian schemes, when the dagger of Mavromichalis opened the way for making Greece an independent kingdom by the assassination of Capodistrias.
The only candidate worthy of the throne of Greece was Leopold of Saxe-Cobourg, the present King of Belgium. He was compelled to resign his pretensions on account of the mutilated form of the territory offered to him by Lord Aberdeen and the Duke of Wellington. Lord Palmerston improved the territorial position of Greece by giving it a better frontier than Lord Aberdeen, but it remained still a very bad one, as Colonel Leake