« AnteriorContinuar »
in truth, very like Egypt-that is, it is the fertile valley of a river running through a barren country, where no rain falls. But there is this difference-first, that while no broader, it is not so long, nor has the fine delta which constitutes
the most valuable portion of Egypt; second, that while Egypt is free from external predatory invasion, Scinde is exceedingly exposed to it; and, thirdly, that while Egypt has a European market for its grain, Scinde has not. Altogether, the conquest was, at the time, as concerns India, much as if we had taken the valley of the Euphrates.
"Half a dozen years later, when we advanced over the plain of the Indus, and annexed the Punjab, we must have arranged to control Scinde too, directly or indirectly, as might be done cheapest; but during those intermediate years it was a gratuitous loss, and the chief cause of the late derangement of our Indian finances." (Pp. 137-139).
The better sword gives the better title! When such is the doctrine maintained, even by a man of the pen, we cannot wonder at its finding a ready expositor in the man of the sword.
But, in truth, Mr Campbell's sword plea, having the merit of honesty and openness, is by far the best that has been advanced; and yet, as he shows, it is only available in support of the right, and not of the policy, of the measure. After-events, he observes, alluding to the conquest of the Punjab, have given a value to Scinde, which in itself it did not possess; but he has omitted to remark that the one event very probably grew out of the other. The Sikhs, who not only had refrained, like the Ameers, from molesting, but had even assisted us in our recent difficulties, had some reason for apprehending that, in due time, the policy pursued in Scinde would be extended to their own more inviting country; while, as if to remove an obstacle to an apparently desired misunderstanding, Sir George Clerk was promoted to the nominally higher post of lieutenant-governor of Agra, and an officer, his very opposite in every quality excepting earnest zeal and undaunted courage, was appointed to be his political successor at Lahore.
Though he is little disposed to state any case too favourably for the party opposed to us, this peculiarity in our
relations with the Sikhs, immediately before their invasion of our territory, is frankly admitted by Mr Campbell. movements calculated to give them After mentioning various military culty as to certain lands belonging to alarm, he describes a political diffithe Sikh state, lying on our side of the Sutledge, which he says had been so managed by two successive political agents, Sir Claude Wade and Sir George Clerk, that through their personal influence "it had so happened that our wishes were generally attended to." He thus concludes:
"Sir George Clerk having been promoted, new men were put in charge of assumed as a right what had heretofore our frontier relations, and seem to have been yielded to a good understanding. In 1845 Major Broadfoot was political agent. He was a man of great talent and immense energy, but of a rather overbearing habit. In difficult and delithe Sikhs. cate times he certainly did not conciliate Altogether, I believe the fact to be, that had Sir George Clerk remained in charge of our political relations, the Sikhs would not have attacked us at the time they did; it might have been delayed: but still it was well that they came when they did."-(Pp. 142, 143.)
History confirms these conclusions, and shows the practical result to have been precisely what a priori reasoning would have led us to expect.
Five great wars were waged in India during the second or judicial period of its administration-that is, from 1793 to 1830. These were-the Mysore war in 1799, the Mahratta war in 1803, the Nepaul war in 1814, the Pindaree war in 1817, and the Burmese war in 1825. There is not one of these against which even a plausible charge of injustice can be maintained by our bitterest foreign foes, or most quick-sighted censorious countrymen.
The acuteness of Mr Cobden himself would be at fault if he were to try to make out a case against the authors of any one of these wars, to satisfy a single sensible man beyond the circle of the "Peace Society."
But how is it with the wars which have occurred since, wandering from judicial ways, the rulers of Gangetic India have pursued whatever course for the moment found favour in their own eyes, with little or no reference to the feelings of their subjects, and with hardly a show of deference to the laws enacted by their predecessors?
The Afghan war of 1838, the Scinde affair of 1843, the Gwalior campaign of 1844, have each in their turn, especially the two first-named, been made the subject of comments neither captious nor fastidious, but resting on indisputable evidence, and supported by reasoning such as pre-formed prejudice alone can resist. The two wars in the Punjab come under the category of the just and necessary; and Lord Hardinge's generous use of the privileges of victory, at the close of the first of these hard-fought conflicts, did much to re-establish our character for justice and moderation. But still these wars are, we fear, coupled in the minds of the people of India with those out of which they sprang, and share in the reproach attaching, in their estimation, to the invasion of Afghanistan and the conquest of
F. H. Robinson's pamphlet is written in a frank conversational style, indicative of his earnest sincerity and his real sympathy with the people of the Upper Ganges, among whom his official life has been spent. We could wish occasionally that his language was a little more measured, for there are passages to startle some of his readers, and so to impair the general effect of his otherwise interesting pamphlet.
We have now reached a point where we may stop to consider the several merits of the works on our list at the head of this article. Mr
Of the style, as well as the matter, of Mr Campbell's more elaborate work, hardness is the chief characteristic. Indeed, he seems to discard all ornament from the one, and all sentiment from the other, and to aim at nothing beyond correctness as to his facts, and positiveness as to his deductions. In this he fully succeeds. His volume is a repertory of useful facts, and his conclusions can never be misapprehended. Some of Mr Campbell's descriptions also are amusing; and we insert, as a specimen of his lighter style, the following sketch of the day of a magistrate and collector in Upper India, that func tionary whose labours are so little known to any but those of his own service, or the people among whom he lives. After enumerating many out-of-door duties despatched in the course of an early morning's ride, the description thus proceeds :
"At breakfast comes the post and the packet of official letters. The commissioner demands explanation on this matter, and transmits a paper of instructions on that; the judge calls for cases which have been appealed; the secretary to Government wants some statistical information; the inspector of prisons fears that the prisoners are growing too fat; the commander of the 105th regiment begs to state that his regiment will halt at certain places on certain days, and that he requires a certain quantity of flour, grain, hay, and eggs; Mr Snooks, the indigo-planter, who is in a state of chronic warfare with his next neighbour, has submitted his grievances in six folio sheets, indifferent English, and a bold hand, and demands instant redress, failing which he threatens the magistrate with Government, the supreme court, an aspersion of his character as a gentleman, a Parliamentary impeachment, a letter to the newspapers, and several other things besides. After breakfast he despatches
his public letters, writes reports, examines returns, &c.
"During this time he has probably a succession of demi-officials from the neighbouring cantonments. There is a great complaint that the villagers have utterly, without provocation, broken the heads of the cavalry grass-cutters, and the grasscutters are sent to be looked at. He goes out to look at them, but no sooner appears than a shout announces that the villagers are waiting in a body,with a slightly different version of the story, to demand justice against the grass-cutters, who have invaded their grass-preserves, despoiled their villages, and were with difficulty prevented from murdering the inhabitants. So the case is sent to the joint magistrate. But there are more notes; some want camels, some carts, and all apply to the magistrate; then there may be natives of rank and condition, who come to pay a serious formal kind of visit, and generally want something; or a chatty native official who has plenty to say for himself.
"All this despatched, he orders his carriage or umbrella, and goes to cutcherry-his regular court. Here he finds a sufficiency of business; there are police, and revenue, and miscellaneous cases of all sorts, appeals from the orders of his subordinates, charges of corruption or misconduct against native officials. All petitions from all persons are received daily in a box, read, and orders duly passed. Those setting forth good grounds of complaint are filed under proper headings; others are rejected, for written reason assigned. After sunset, comes his evening, which is probably like his morning ride, mixed up with official and demiofficial affairs, and only at dark does the wearied magistrate retire to dinner and to private life."-(Pp. 248-249).
Mr Kaye's essay recommends itself by the same easy flow of language as made his History of the Afghan War such agreeable reading. His plan does not admit of his giving more than a series of sketches; but his outlines are so clear, and his selection of topics to fill up with is so happy, that we can safely recommend his volume to any one who, without leisure or inclination for more minute study of the subject, may still wish to obtain some general idea of the administration of our vast Eastern empire. In a note at page 661, Mr Kaye informs us, that in the summer of 1852 the Duke of Newcastle told the Haileybury students that, during a recent
tour in the Tyrol, he had met an intelligent Austrian general who, in the course of conversation on our national resources, said that he could understand all the elements of our greatness except our Anglo-Indian empire, and that he could not understand. The vast amount of administrative wisdom which the good government of such an empire demanded, baffled his comprehension.
The Austrian general, perhaps, would not have readily assented to the explanation of the marvel given by the young French naturalist, Vicfrom the confines of Tartary, in tor Jaquemont, who, in a letter dated August 1830, thus writes to a relative in Paris: "The ideas entertained in France about this country are absurd; the governing talents of the English are immense; ours, on the contrary, are very mediocre; and we believe the former to be embarrassed when we see them in circumstances in which our awkwardness would be completely at a stand-still."-(English translation of Victor Jaquemont's Letters, vol. i. p. 169).
The lady whose three volumes come next under our notice is certainly one of the most intelligent travellers of her sex who has visited India since the days when Maria Graham, afterwards Lady Callcott, amused her readers in England, and enraged many of her female acquaintances in India, by describing the latter as generally "under-bred and overdressed."
lady's lively account of her own been, like the late Sir Charles Napier, friendly intercourse with families of one whose errors of the pen are more another faith, upon whom her indus- than redeemed by a career of long trious energy, quickened and regulated and glorious services. Still, though by a zeal for her own religion, openly this consideration may soften, it ought avowed and studiously exhibited as not to silence criticism, for errors her main motive of action, cannot, never more require correction than we imagine, have failed to produce a when heralded by an illustrious name. deep and lasting impression. We An additional reason for not passing trust that Mrs Mackenzie's example over the last work of so distinguished may be followed by many of our a man is, that it contains many adcountrywomen ; for the information mirable remarks on the Native army, in which, of all others, the English well deserving to be detached from functionaries in the East are most the mass of other matter in which deficient—that regarding natives in they are imbedded. The contents of their private and domestic sphere-is the book may be classed under three precisely what our ladies alone have heads : Censure of individuals ; centhe power to acquire and impart. sure of public bodies; suggestive reMrs Mackenzie, it is true, mingled marks on the civil and military chiefly with the Afghans, who are a administration of India. more attractive race than the people On whatever comes under the first of India.
of these heads, our strictures shall be The Afgbans, also, must have felt brief. inclined to open their hearts to the We find in the list of those cen. wife of one who, both as a soldier in sured, the names of so many of the the field, and afterwards as a captive best and ablest men who have taken in their hands, had commanded the part in Indian affairs, either at home sincere respect of those among whom or in the East, that we feel loth to he was thrown. But though all can give any additional publicity to what not have her advantages, there is no we have read with pain, and would lady whose husband holds office in gladly forget. Public bodies being India, who, if she makes herself ac- fair targets to shoot at, the censures quainted with the languages of the coming under the second head are country, will not find native women open to no objection excepting such of rank and respectability ready to as may arise from their not standing cultivate her acquaintance, and thus the test of close examination. The afford her the means of solving some Court of Directors, the Supreme of those problems of the native cha- Council of India, the whole body of racter which elude all the researches the Civil Service (with one or two of our best-informed public function exceptions), the Political Agents, the aries. Having said thus much in Military Board in Calcutta, and the praise of Mrs Mackenzie's book, we Board of Administration in the Puncannot but censure most strongly the jab, follow each other like arraigned attempt at spicing her work with criminals in the black scroll of the gossipping tales calculated to wound author's antipathies. To notice all the feelings of private individuals that is advanced against those inamong her own countrymen, and even cluded in this catalogue would be of the officers of her husband's own impossible, for a few lines may conservice, with whose characters she tain assertions which it would fill a deals with a most unsparing degree folio to discuss. Of the East India of reproachful raillery, designating Company, the instrument through individuals as Colonel A., Major B., which India has been providentially or Captain C. of the - Regiment, preserved from the corruptions of an stationed at such a place, so that aristocratic and the precipitancy of there cannot be a doubt as to whom a more popular rule, Sir Charles the anecdotes, which are always to Napier's view is not more enlarged the discredit of the parties, refer. than what we might have got from
The difficulty of commenting on a bis own Sir Fiddle Faddle, of whom posthumous work is much enhanced he has left us (at page 253) so amuswhen the author happens to have ing a description. Though capable, as
we shall soon see, of rising above the prejudices of his profession on other points, he looks at this singular Company and its governing Court with the eyes of a Dugald Dalgetty, who, while pocketing the commercial body's extra pay, accounts it foul scorn to be obliged to submit to such base and mechanical control.
But none are all bad, and we rejoice to see it admitted at page 210 of the unfriendly book before us, that "the Directors, generally speaking, treat their army well;" and at pages 49, 261, that the Company's artillery, formed under the rule of these very Directors, is "superb, second to none in the world-perfect." Yet it never seems to have occurred to the author, that those under whose rule one department has reached perfection, are not likely to blunder in every other, as in his moments of spleen he made himself believe. So able a man as Sir C. Napier could not always be blind to his own inconsistencies; and accordingly, in the midst of some declamation on what India might be under royal government, he seems to have been suddenly brought up by a thought about what the Crown Colonies really are.
From this dilemma he escapes by saddling one distinguished personage with the blame of all that is wrong in the colonies, and thus punishes Earl Grey for the speech about Scinde, made by Lord Howick, some ten years ago, in the House of Commons.
To the Supreme Council of India, though he was one of their number, the author never makes any but disparaging allusions. Discontented with being a commander-in-chief under a ruling body, of which he was himself a member, he sought to be recognised as the head of a separate military government. He wished, in short, to be, not what the Duke of York was in England, but what, under peculiar circumstances, the Duke of Wellington was in Spain during the war in the Peninsula. In this he was not singular; for we suspect that the real cause of that uneasiness in their position, stated at page 355, to have been manifested by many of Sir C. Napier's predecessors, is to be found in a desire on their part for such an independency of military administrative power, as
VOL. LXXVI.-NO. CCCCLXVI.
is totally incompatible with the necessary unity and indivisibility of a government. Yet it is admitted that, in England, "when war comes, the war-minister is the real commander,"
(p. 220.) The author evidently felt how much this admission must tell against his own complaints of undue interference with his authority; for he endeavours, by some feeble special pleading, to abate its effect, and to prove the "poor Indian general," with his £15,000 a-year, to be more unfavourably placed than his confrère in England.
One circumstance, however, is such, that while the latter is excluded from the Cabinet, the former can take his seat at the Council-Board, and his part in the guidance of the counsels of the State.
It is, we think, greatly to be regretted that Sir C. Napier did not more frequently avail himself of this privilege, for by keeping apart from the Supreme Council he lost the benefit of free personal communication with equals, and incurred the evil of having none near him but subordinates, whom he could silence by a word or a look.
The Civil Service is represented simply as a nuisance requiring immediate abatement.
We are told that "a Civil form of government is uncongenial to barbarous Eastern nations." There is some truth in this, if a proper stress is laid on the word barbarous. In the first chapter of the fourth part of his work, Mr Kaye has shown how, in reaching the outskirts of civilisation, we are brought into contact with rude tribes like the Beloches in Scinde, "to whose feelings and habits the rough ways of Sir C. Napier were better adapted than the refined tenderness or the judicial niceties of the gentlest and wisest statesman that ever loved and toiled for a people." But the error of such reasoners as Sir C. Napier is, that they would treat all India as barbarous, and rule it accordingly. Now, with all our respect for Sir C. Napier's talents, we doubt much whether he would have governed the more civilised provinces of Upper India better than the late Mr Thomason, whom he condescends to praise (p. 37); or managed the subtle and well-man