Imágenes de página
PDF
ePub

And this Interpretation is agreeable to the importance of the Greek Word, Adula, which we here render Unrighteousness , and does in some other Places, fignify Falfeness or Deceitfulness. And this Acceptation of the Words may be confirmed, by comparing them with the like Expresfion at the 11th Verse, the Unrighteous Mammon; which, as it stands in opposition to True Riches, denotes that Earthly Treasures are not properly and truly to te esteem'd Riches: They do in this resemble the Possessors of them, that they are Deceitful upon the Weights, they are altogether lightert han Vanity it self. Spiritual Blessings are the only True Riches; which are therefore here opposed to Temporal Possessions, the Unrighteous Mammnon, or False and Deceitful Riches.

Our Blessed Lord therefore requires his Disciples to devote their Riches unto good Works, in expectation of a Future Reward. The Expressions in the Text, are adapted to the Circumstances in the foregoing Parable. As the Unjuft Steward did, by his management, secure himself of Friends and Future Reception; so our

Saviour

H

3

Saviour suggests this Inducemept to Works of Charity, that by the faithful Performance of them, we shall, in effect, make to our felves Friends, who, when we fail, when we are removed out of our Stewardship, out of this World by Death, will secure our Admission into a Future and Eternal State of Happiness.

Such is the Occasion, and such the Importance of the Words, which may supply us with matter of Meditation, under the three following Enquiries:

I. How far, and in what Respects, we : . are obliged to dispense our Wealth

in Acts of Charity?

II. Upon what Accounts chiefly it is,

that those Charitable Dispensations are to be esteemed so Excellent, as they are supposed to be in the Text?

III. In what Sense we are to under

stand that Efficacy, which here seems to be ascribed to them?

[ocr errors]

· I. It should be inquired, How far, and in what respects, we are obliged to difpense our Wealth in Acts of Charity? And, in relation to the Special and Restrain'd Sense of this Expression, the Mammon of Unrighteousness, 'tis to be observ’d, that there are Cases, wherein Alms-deeds would be not only Unnecessary, but Unlawful; because they would be attended with the Violation of Justice. Satisfaction must be made to those who are Injur’d, before Provision for those who are in Want. Riches procur’d by Theft or Fraud, Extortion or Oppression, do not properly render a Man capable of performing Acts of Charity, but lay him under a Necessity of making Restitution. But if the Persons Injured are not known, or if it does, by any other Necessary Obstacle and Impediment, become impoffible to make Restitution, then should the Riches, which are Wrongfully engrossed, be Devoted to good Works: And yet such Works are rather to be esteemed Acts of Justice, than of Charity.

The fame Measures should be taken when Circumstances are such, that Restitution is not necessary, notwithstanding that Opportunities of making it may easily be found. Such are the Circumstances of Persons corrupted by Bribery. For since every Bribe is at once a Voluntary Gift, and the Fruit of Injustice, the Sordid Giver hath forfeited all Rightful Claim to it, and therefore Equity does not require that it should be restored to him; and yet it cannot Lawfully be retained by the Polluted Hands of him who receives it, because he hath no Propriety in it, unless Propriety can be grounded upon Injustice : And therefore it should be appropriated to Works of Charity. And in General, all Unlawful Possessions should be intirely given up by Reftitution, where that is possible and Necessary; and where it is not, they should be disposed of in good Works, without excepting and reserving any the least Part of them; for it is a Cursed thing.

But it feldom becomes Necessary to give up all our Just Possessions, for the

relief

[ocr errors]

relief of the Poor. Indeed we find, that amongst the First Christians the Rich did admit the Indigent to a Free and Illimited Participation of their Riches: The Bounty of the one was determined by no measure but the Wants of the other. For as * they had all things Common, which they possessed; so, when the Posesfors of Lands or Houses fold them, t Distribution was made unto every Man according as he had Need. These were Eminent and Glorious Effects of Charity; but we do not find these Degrees of it Indispensably and Universally required.

Our Blessed Saviour indeed lays this Injunction upon the Ruler; I Šell all that thou hast, and distribute unto the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven. This Person was without doubt under a Necessary Obligation to Obey this Command, which was Particularly given to Him; but it does not seem Obligatory upon those, to whom it is not Particularly given; unless the Obligation of it should arise from some Uncommon and

* Aệts iv. 32.

Ver. 34, 35.

Luke xviii. 22.

« AnteriorContinuar »