Weak are the ties that civil arts can find, And awes the Brave that earth and heav'n defy'd, 115 120 125 130 But with the friends of Vice, the foes of SATIRE, All truth is fplecn; all juft reproof, ill-nature. Well may they dread the Mufe's fatal skill; Well may they tremble when the draws her quill: 135 Drags Drags the vile whisperer from his dark abode, O fordid maxim, form'd to fcreen the vile, 140 145 150 Scarce more the friend of man, the wife muft own, Ev'n ALLEN's bounteous hand, than SATIRE's frown: Oft' on unfeeling hearts the fhaft is spent : X 2 155 160 165 Whofe Whofe is the crime, the fcandal too be theirs : PART II. ARE nobly then: but confcious of your truft, As ever warm and bold, be ever just : Nor court applause in these degenerate days : 170 But chief, be fteady in a noble end, And fhew mankind that truth has yet a friend. "Tis mean for empty praise of wit to write, 175 As foplings grin to show their teeth are white: To brand a doubtful folly with a smile, Or madly blaze unknown defects, is vile: O loft to honour's voice, O doom'd to shame, That name, than liberty, than life more dear! 180 185 And know, immortal truth shall mock thy toil: Immortal truth fhall bid the shaft recoil; With rage retorted, wing the deadly dart; And empty all its poifon in thy heart. 190 With caution, next, the dang'rous power apply; An eagle's talon afks an eagle's eye: Let Let SATIRE then her proper object know, Nor fondly deem the real fool confeft, Lo, Shaftfb'ry rears her high on Reafon's throne, 195 200 Big It were to be wished that lord Shaftsbury had expressed bimself with greater precision on this fubject: however, thus much be may affirmed with truth. Ift, By the general tenor of his essays on Enthusiasm, and the freedom of wit and humour, it appears that his principal defign was to recommend the way of ridicule, (as he calls t) for the investigation of truth, and detection of falsehood, not only in moral but religious subjects. 2dly, It appears no less evident, that in the course of his reafonings on this question, he confounds two things which are in their nature and confequences entirely different. Thefe are ridicule and good-humour: the latter acknowledged by all to be the best mediator in every debate; the former no lefs regarded by most, as an embroiler and incendiary. Tho' he fets out with a formal profeffion of proving the efficacy of wit, humour, and ridicule, in the investigation of truth, yet by fhifting and mixing his terms, he generally flides infenfibly into mere encomiums on good breeding, chearfulness, urbanity, and free enquiry. This indeed keeps fomething like an argument on foot, and amufes the fuperficial reader; but to a more obfervant eye difcovers a very contemptible defect, either of fincerity or penetration. The question concerning ridicule may be thus not improperly ftated, Whether doubtful propofitions of any kind can be determined by the application of ridicule ? Much might be X 3 Said Big-fwoln with folly, as her fmiles provoke, 205 Sublimer faid on this question; but a few words will make the matter clear to an unprejudiced mind. The difapprobation or contempt which certain objects raise in the mind of man, is a particular mode of paffion. The objects of this paffion are apparent falsehood, incongruity, or impropriety of fome particular kinds. Thus, the object of fear is apparent danger: the object of anger is apparent injury. But who bath ever dreamt of exalting the paffions of fear and anger into a standard or teft of real danger and injury? The defign must have been rejected as abfurd, because it is the work of reafon only, to correct and fix the paffions on their proper objects. The cafe is parallel: apparent or feeming falsehoods, &c. are the objects of contempt; but it is the work of reafon only, to determine whether the fuppofed falfehood be real or fictitious. But it is said, "The fenfe of ridicule can never be mistaken." -Why, no more can the sense of danger, or the sense of injury. "What, do men never fear or refent without reafon ?". Yes, very commonly : but they as often despise and laugh without reafon. Thus before any thing can be determined in either cafe, reafon, and reason only, muft examine circumftances, Separate ideas, decide upon, reftrain, and correct the palion. Hence it follows, that the way of ridicule, of late fo much celebrated, is in fact no more than a Species of eloquence; and that too the lowest of all others: o Tully justly calls it, tenuiffimus ingenii fructus. It applies to a paffion, and therefore can go no farther in the investigation of truth, than |