Imágenes de página
PDF
ePub

the above mentioned period, the extension to the Economic Union of advantages accorded by the United States of America to the Philippines. Accept, Sir, the renewed assurance of my highest consideration.

SILVERCRUYS

The Belgian Ambassador

The Honorable DEAN ACHESON

Acting Secretary of State
Washington, D. C.

RECIPROCAL TRADE

Agreement and exchange of letters signed at Geneva October 30, 1947
Entered into force October 30, 1947; operative January 1, 1948
Terminated February 10, 1963 1

61 Stat. 3689; Treaties and Other International Acts Series 1701

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND BELGIUM

SUPPLEMENTARY TO THE GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE

The Government of the United States of America and, on behalf of the Belgo-Luxemburg Economic Union, the Government of the Kingdom of Belgium,

Having participated in the framing of a General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and a Protocol of Provisional Application, the texts of which have been authenticated by the Final Act adopted at the conclusion of the Second Session of the Preparatory Committee of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Employment, signed this day,

Hereby agree that the Trade Agreement between the United States of America and the Belgo-Luxemburg Economic Union, signed February 27, 1935,3 shall be inoperative for such time as the United States of America and Belgium are both contracting parties to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade as defined in Article XXXII thereof; Provided, that in the event that either the United States of America or Belgium should withdraw its application of the General Agreement, and the said Trade Agreement should thereupon again become operative, the customs treatment accorded by the Belgo-Luxemburg Economic Union to products of the United States of America described in Schedule I of the said Trade Agreement shall be no less favorable than that provided for such products in the Customs Tariff annexed to the Belgo-Luxemburg-Netherlands Customs Convention concluded September 5, 1944, as amended by the Protocol signed March 14, 1947.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the representatives of the Governments of the United States of America and the Kingdom of Belgium, after having ex

1

1 Pursuant to notice of termination given by the United States Aug. 10, 1962.

* TIAS 1700, ante, vol. 4, pp. 641 and 687.

3

* EAS 75, ante, p. 710.

changed their full powers, found to be in good and due form, have signed this Supplementary Agreement.

DONE in duplicate, in the English and French languages, both texts authentic, at Geneva, this thirtieth day of October, one thousand nine hundred and forty-seven.

For the Government of the United States of America:
WINTHROP G. BROWN

For the Government of the Kingdom of Belgium:
P. A. FORTHOMME

EXCHANGE OF LETTERS

The Acting Chairman of the United States Delegation to the Second Session of the Preparatory Committee of the U.N. Conference on Trade and Employment to the Acting Chairman of the Belgo-Luxembourg Delegation OCTOBER 30, 1947

DEAR MR. FORTHOMME:

A point of legal detail has been brought to my attention in connection with the Agreement Supplementary to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade which we propose to sign on behalf of our two Governments on October 30 making the Reciprocal Trade Agreement of 1935 between the United States and the Belgo-Luxemburg Economic Union inoperative so long as both the United States and the Belgo-Luxemburg Economic Union are parties to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.

As you know, the Agreement entered into between the United States and the Belgo-Luxemburg Economic Union in 1935 provides that it may be terminated by either party after three years on six months' notice. The inclusion of such a provision in all our trade agreements is required by the Trade Agreements Act. Our lawyers have suggested that the very general terms of the proposed Supplementary Agreement might possibly be interpreted as making it impossible for either party to the 1935 Agreement to exercise this right of termination.

It is, of course, improbable that either of our Governments would wish to exercise this right of termination, but under our law we must, nevertheless, retain it in force. To suggest a formal amendment to the proposed Supplementary Agreement expressly excepting the termination provision of the 1935 Agreement at this late date would cause considerable inconvenience and would give greater emphasis to this point than it deserves. I am therefore writing to make it clear that we would be signing the Supplementary Agreement with the understanding that its general language would not prevent notice of termination of the 1935 Agreement given by either party while we

were both parties to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade from effecting termination of the 1935 Agreement in six months.

I would appreciate it if you could give me the assurance that your Government has the same understanding.

Sincerely yours

WINTHROP G. BROWN

Acting Chairman

Mr. P. A. FORTHOMME

The Delegation of Belgium-Luxemburg

Palais des Nations

The Acting Chairman of the Belgo-Luxembourg Delegation to the Acting Chairman of the United States Delegation

ds/EM

DEAR MR. BROWN,

GENEVA, October 30th, 1947

I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your letter dated October 30, 1947, in which you wrote:

[For text of U.S. note, see above.]

I can give you the assurance that my Government has the same understanding about this matter.

Sincerely yours,

MR. WINTHROP G. BROWN

The Delegation of United States

Palais des Nations

Geneva

P. A. FORTHOMME

Acting Chairman

PEACE, FRIENDSHIP, COMMERCE,

AND NAVIGATION

Treaty signed at La Paz May 13, 1858

Senate advice and consent to ratification, with an amendment, June 26, 1860 2

Ratified by the President of the United States, with an amendment,

October 5, 18602

Ratified by Bolivia, with explanation of article 2, August 27, 1861
Senate advice and consent to ratification, with Bolivian amendments,
February 3, 1862 3

3

Ratified by the President of the United States, with amendments, February 17, 1862 3

3

Ratified by Bolivia, with amendments, November 7, 1862

Ratifications exchanged at La Paz November 9, 1862

Entered into force November 9, 1862

Proclaimed by the President of the United States January 8, 1863 Article 34 abrogated by the United States July 1, 1916, in accordance with Seamen's Act of March 4, 1915*

Modified by understanding of May 4 and June 10, 1946 5

12 Stat. 1003; Treaty Series 32°

TREATY OF PEACE, FRIENDSHIP, Commerce, and NAVIGATION, BETWEEN
THE UNITED States of AMERICA AND THE REPUBLIC OF BOLIVIA
The United States of America and the Republic of Bolivia, desiring to
make lasting and firm the friendship and good understanding which happily

1

See also post, PERU-BOLIVIAN CONFEDERATION.

The U.S. amendment reads as follows: "Article XIV [14]. Strike out the last clause of this Article in the following words: 'However, the interment in Bolivia of a Citizen of the United States, who is not of the Roman Catholic faith, shall be conducted without any of the external ceremonies peculiar to the faith of the deceased.'

The text printed here is the amended text, with the explanation of art. 2, as proclaimed by the President.

In its second resolution of advice and consent the Senate accepted a Bolivian proposal for insertion of an explanation of art. 2 (for text of explanation, see p. 722) and provided that "the ratifications of the said Treaty and of these amendments, shall be exchanged by the duly authorized authorities of the respective governments, either at the City of Washington or at the Capital of the Republic of Bolivia, within such period as may be mutually convenient to both governments, any provision contained in the said Treaty to the contrary notwithstanding."

38 Stat. 1164. The abrogation of art. 34 was confirmed by the United States and Bolivia in an exchange of notes at La Paz Oct. 4 and 5, 1915 (TS 32–A).

5 61 Stat. 2437; TIAS 1572.

* For a detailed study of this treaty, see Miller 733.

« AnteriorContinuar »