confirmation of his opinion, the Reviewer adverts to the Editorial portion of the work in these terms. "This edition is accompanied with very curious and interesting notes, gathering from the newspapers, magazines, and journals of the time whatever anecdotes and paragraphs chiefly serve to elucidate the biographical, literary, and factious allusions so common in the works of Churchill. Besides the notes, which are very curious and entertaining even where they are superfluous, a satisfactory biography is prefixed, the Editor in short has executed his office with unusual diligence and complete propriety."

The critique concludes with the following suggestion, and renewed favourable appreciation of the notes.

"If all the known prose works of Churchill were appended to his letters this edition would then become as complete as can reasonably be desired or expected; it would be the classical form of possessing the works of this occasionally spirited and once popular writer. What of attraction they still retain, would be greatly enhanced by the anecdotes and amusive information scattered throughout the commentary. A greater service cannot be rendered to an author's reputation than to select from the transient and perishable literature of his time whatever can assist in rendering his allusions intelligible and his personages important. This task has been performed with diligence and impartiality, which in the Editor's own opinion is the highest praise to which a work of this kind can aspire."

In the subsequent memoir and notes it will be found that no such known works exist, although there is good reason to believe that some of the

numbers of the North Briton and papers in the Library were written by Churchill, but which cannot now be identified. The Sermons published under his name after his death were most probably transcribed by him from some of his father's manuscript discourses, for the mere purpose of prefixing to them the pungent dedication to Warburton, which he did not live to complete and publish.

LIFE OF CHARLES CHURCHILL.

WHILE it is frequently made a matter of complaint, by most biographers, that the noiseless tenor of an author's life affords so few materials for the pen, is so barren of incident, and so deficient in novelty and interest, as to call forth all their anecdotic if not inventive powers to excite attention, that of Churchill, it is to be lamented, affords too much opportunity for relating facts beyond the limits of his literary labours, facts too notorious to be suppressed, and too immoral to be palliated.

The Life of Churchill may be divided into two periods, as unequal in length as in the celebrity which attached to them. During the first period of seven-and-twenty years, with the exception of a few indiscretions, his conduct in every relation, as son, as brother, as husband, as father, and as friend, was rigidly and exemplarily, though obscurely virtuous; while the remaining six years present an odious contrast.

It is somewhat singular that no authentic memoir should hitherto have been published of a poet once so celebrated, who, during the latter period of his life, attracted, more than any of his contemporaries, the attention of the public. The variety of letters, essays, papers, poems, and paragraphs relating to him with which the press teemed from 1761 to 1765, would scarcely be credited, except after as laborious a search into the Reviews, Pamphlets, Magazines, and Newspapers of that period as has been made for the purpose of ob

taining the elucidations contained in the remarks on the following poems. Yet a man thus the universal theme of censure, praise, or imitation, died in the meridian of his reputation, and not one of his surviving literary friends was found to undertake the task of rescuing his fame from the malignant and exaggerated aspersions of his enemies, and of paying to his memory the just tribute of an authentic narrative.

The first account that was published of Churchill after his death appeared in the Annual Register for 1764, and that partial and inaccurate statement is the groundwork of all the biographical notices of his life which have since appeared. His subsequent biographers, sensible of the paucity of their materials, have endeavoured to compensate for their deficiency in real information, by exerting their talents for invention. False relations, witticisms, forged letters, and imaginary anecdotes have been substituted for truth and consistency. It is not by any means intended in these pages to engage in a refutation of the numerous errors and misrepresentations with which these narratives abound; such a refutation might indeed serve to swell the volume, but the triumph would be dearly purchased at the expense of the readers' patience. It will be endeavoured, therefore, without farther adverting to the demerits of others, to confine the narrative to the single object of laying before the public a short and unembellished account of our Author, possessing no other advantages than those of authenticity and impartiality.

CHARLES CHURCHILL was the eldest son of the Reverend Charles Churchill, Rector of Rainham, near Grays, in Essex, who had been many years curate and lecturer of St. John the Evangelist,

Westminster, to which he was appointed in February, 1733. He was born at his father's house in Vine Street, in the last mentioned parish, some time in February, 1731. When about eight years of age, he was sent as a day boy to Westminster school, of which seminary Dr. Nichols and Dr. Pierson Lloyd were masters; while his father, who was every way qualified for the office, superintended his education during the intervals of public study. His proficiency in classical learning was considerable, but not so extraordinary as to entitle him to any pre-eminence over several of his schoolfellows in the same class. He as yet exhibited no promise of that brilliancy of imagination, that vigour and force of genius, which, in maturer years, were his peculiar characteristics.

At the age of fifteen, he became a candidate for admission on the foundation at Westminster, and went in head of the election; soon afterwards a circumstance happened which gave some indication of the strength and bent of his abilities. Having by a puerile misdemeanour incurred the displeasure of his masters, he was enjoined to compose and recite in the school-room a poetical declamation in Latin, by way of apology. Of this task he acquitted himself in so becoming, yet spirited a manner, as to obtain the unqualified approbation of his masters, without forfeiting the esteem of his school-fellows: among whom were Cowper, Warren Hastings, Thornton, Colman, and Lloyd.

At the age of eighteen, he stood for a fellowship at Merton College, when he was only in the second election at Westminster, that is, between two and three years from the regular time for leaving the school; when, being opposed by can