Framing the Iraq War Endgame: War's Denouement in an Age of Terror

Portada
Springer, 28 sept 2009 - 278 páginas
The Bush administration was remarkably successful in dominating the debate over why we had to go to war with Iraq, but it would soon be faced with the more daunting task of winning the monumental rhetorical struggle over how to write the script of the Iraq War endgame. We examine the twists and turns of the discursive battle over the war's denouement as it played out against the backdrop of the war on terror, and we conclude that while Bush failed to win the argument that Iraq was one with our fight against terrorism, his underlying worldview that we must confront terrorist evil through global military engagement remains an important component of Obama adminstration rhetoric.
 

Índice

Constructing the Endgame Narrative for a Different Kind of War
1
1 Dominating the Discourse of Terror
25
2 Fighting the Central Front in the War on Terror
49
3 Recasting Iraq as War on Terror
77
4 Challenging the Iraq Victory Narrative
101
5 Confronting Chaos in Iraq
125
6 Changing Americas Course in Iraq
157
7 Envisioning Wars Denouement
188
Notes
217
References
237
Página de créditos

Términos y frases comunes

Sobre el autor (2009)


ERIKA G. KING is Professor of Political Science at Grand Valley State University, USA.
ROBERT WELLS is Professor of Political Science at Thiel College.

Información bibliográfica