Appeal to Pity: Argumentum ad Misericordiam

Portada
SUNY Press, 1 ene 1997 - 225 páginas
Appeal to pity has frequently been exploited with amazing success as a deceptive tactic of argumentation, so much so that it has traditionally been treated as a fallacy. Using a case study method, the author examines examples of appeals to pity and compassion in real arguments in order to classify, analyze, and evaluate the types of arguments used in these appeals. Among the cases studied are the controversial use of "poster kids" in the Jerry Lewis Telethon for Muscular Dystrophy and the "baby incubators story" deployed by a public relations firm to influence the decision to send U.S. forces into Kuwait during the Gulf War. In addition to the analyses of these and other case studies, this book provides, for the first time, precise guidelines and useful criteria with which to identify, analyze, and evaluate instances of the ad misericordiam argument.
 

Índice

The Textbook Treatment
1
Irrelevance
2
Appeal to Pity as Inherently Fallacious
5
Not All Cases Fallacious?
7
Legal Cases
11
The Students Plea Case
15
Excuses as Arguments
20
Charitable Appeals
22
The Structure of the Argument
101
The Nayirah Case
127
When Is It a Fallacy?
150
Subtypes of Ad Misericordiam Fallacy
161
The Pragmatic View of Fallacy
162
Sensitivity to Context
166
Defining Relevance
168
The Logical Leap from Ethical Premises
169

Argument from Consequences
26
Judging the Fallacious Cases
28
Summary
31
Historical Background
35
Earliest Known Origins of Ad Misericordiam
38
Ancient Use as a Courtroom Tactic
41
Socrates Rejection of Appeal to Pity
45
Aristotle on Appeal to Pity Eleos
48
The Stoic Condemnation of Pity
51
The Christian View of Pity
54
Sympathy as an Ethical Concept
57
Early Modern Views of Pity
59
Terminological Questions
61
Identifying the Ad Misericordiam As a Type of Argument
64
Evaluation of Case Studies
173
The Menendez Case
175
The Baby Seals
179
Effectiveness of Ad Misericordiam Arguments
182
Comparing Cases
184
Further Comments on Cases
186
The Students Plea Case Analyzed
190
The Thackeray Case
192
Summary of the Method
194
Revising the Textbooks
197
Notes
199
Bibliography
205
Index
217
Página de créditos

Otras ediciones - Ver todo

Términos y frases comunes

Sobre el autor (1997)

Douglas Walton is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Winnipeg, Canada. He is the author of numerous books, including Plausible Argument in Everyday Conversation and Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning, both published by SUNY Press, as well as Arguments from Ignorance; Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning; A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy; The Pace of Emotion in Argument; Slippery Slope Arguments; Begging the Question: Circular Reasoning as a Tactic of Argumentation; Practical Reasoning: Goal-Driven, Knowledge-Based, Action-Guiding Argumentation; and Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation.

Información bibliográfica